ArticleHNO2021
[Quality management in a postgraduate refresher course in otolaryngology].
Article in HNO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResidency training is often characterized by locally influenced training content and focus, which can lead to heterogeneous training outcomes. Refresher courses before the speciality certificate examinations can harmonize the situation.
objectiveThe current publication aims to present a quality management system for evaluation of a postgraduate refresher course for otolaryngology residents. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe teaching sessions of a postgraduate course were evaluated using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis were performed. To evaluate the factors leading to a negative perception of a teaching session, the focus was set on the worst 15% of all total ratings. An exemplary strength/weakness profile of a lecturer was created for individual feedback.
resultsAnalysis of the evaluation results showed an overall average rating of 12.8 (±2.4) out of a maximum of 15 possible points. Multivariable regression determined the items "friendliness," "systematic structure," "own involvement," "prior knowledge," and "efficient teaching session" to be significant for a negative perception of a teaching session. Using the lecturer profile, the strengths and weaknesses of the individual lecturer can be shown in an objective manner.
conclusionThe developed questionnaire represents a good tool for quality management of a postgraduate refresher course for otolaryngology residents. This is achieved by regression analysis and creation of an individual lecturer profile, which provides an objective basis for improving the individual teaching session through detailed feedback to the lecturer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.