ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2021
Clinical Laboratory Biosafety Gaps: Lessons Learned from Past Outbreaks Reveal a Path to a Safer Future.
Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ebola laboratory preparedness at frontline hospitals: can we or can't we?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- The CDC/APHL next generation sequencing quality initiative: practical guidance to implementing quality management systems in laboratories performing next generation sequencing (phase 2).Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Application of synthetic patient samples in biochemistry laboratory case-based learning course to improve biosafety.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- MPOX transmission risks and biosafety protocols in laboratory animal research.Laboratory animal research · 2026Review
- Development of a High-Resolution Melting (HRM)-Based Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay of PEDV, TGEV, PoRV, PDCoV, PRV, and PRRSV.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Probiotics as eco-friendlybio-preservatives: In vivo mechanisms of mycotoxin inhibition and emerging applications for food safety and human health.Mycotoxin research · 2025Review
- Review
- Climate change and medical laboratory operations: Impacts, challenges, and adaptation strategies: A narrative review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Perceptions of psychological safety in high-containment laboratories: mixed method survey of community members and industry experts.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Implementation of the laboratory strategic framework to strengthen health laboratory services in Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2016-2023.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Surveillance of laboratory exposures to human pathogens and toxins, Canada, 2023.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025Article
- Biosafety Management Practices Among Clinical Laboratory Professionals in Debre Berhan Town Governmental Hospitals, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Biosafety status analysis and risk assessment of laboratories from 2021 to 2023 in Jiaxing, China.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- The need to establish and recognize the field of clinical laboratory science (CLS) as an essential field in advancing clinical goals.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Biosafety Management Based Upon Risk Assessment and Monitoring: Perspectives from a Clinical Laboratory, China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Review
- Capsule-based colorimetric temperature monitoring system for customizable cold chain management.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2023Article
- Best practices for implementing biosafety inspections in a clinical laboratory: Evidence from a multi-site experimental study.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient care and public health require timely, reliable laboratory testing. However, clinical laboratory professionals rarely know whether patient specimens contain infectious agents, making ensuring biosafety while performing testing procedures challenging. The importance of biosafety in clinical laboratories was highlighted during the 2014 Ebola outbreak, where concerns about biosafety resulted in delayed diagnoses and contributed to patient deaths. This review is a collaboration between subject matter experts from large and small laboratories and the federal government to evaluate the capability of clinical laboratories to manage biosafety risks and safely test patient specimens. We discuss the complexity of clinical laboratories, including anatomic pathology, and describe how applying current biosafety guidance may be difficult as these guidelines, largely based on practices in research laboratories, do not always correspond to the unique clinical laboratory environments and their specialized equipment and processes. We retrospectively describe the biosafety gaps and opportunities for improvement in the areas of risk assessment and management; automated and manual laboratory disciplines; specimen collection, processing, and storage; test utilization; equipment and instrumentation safety; disinfection practices; personal protective equipment; waste management; laboratory personnel training and competency assessment; accreditation processes; and ethical guidance. Also addressed are the unique biosafety challenges successfully handled by a Texas community hospital clinical laboratory that performed testing for patients with Ebola without a formal biocontainment unit. The gaps in knowledge and practices identified in previous and ongoing outbreaks demonstrate the need for collaborative, comprehensive solutions to improve clinical laboratory biosafety and to better combat future emerging infectious disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.