Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105896›Full record

SynthesisNursing open2022

Enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: An umbrella review.

Jing Li, Frances Lin, Shuhui Yu, Andrea P Marshall

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing LiNursing department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-466X
Frances LinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia.
Shuhui YuUrological Ward, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Andrea P MarshallSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify, synthesize and appraise the systematic reviews of ERAS for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery and facilitate ERAS implementation.

designAn umbrella review was used to identify systematic reviews.

methodsA systematic search following the PRISMA guidelines was used to search databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang and VJIP. AMSTAR 2 was used to appraise the quality of included reviews.

resultsTen systematic reviews were included. The quality of all included systematic reviews was rated as "critically low." The most frequently reported ERAS elements were epidurals analgesia/PCA (9/10), goal-directed mobilization (9/10) and early removal of drains (9/10). Only one review mentioned audit protocol compliance. None of the included reviews reported discharge standards. Ten reviews reported decreased length of stay, seven reviews reported lower hospital costs, and six reviews reported decreased total complications rate. There were no adverse effects reported.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansPatient DischargeSystematic Reviews as Topicenhanced recoverypancreatic surgeryumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID34105896
PMCPMC8859084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.