Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105873›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2022

Exploring prevalence of wound infections and related patient characteristics in homecare using natural language processing.

Kyungmi Woo, Jiyoun Song, Victoria Adams, Lorraine J Block, Leanne M Currie, Jingjing Shang, Maxim Topaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Natural language processing in dermatology: A systematic literature review and state of the art.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adult home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development and Evaluation ofGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kyungmi WooCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-2696
Jiyoun SongSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0362-0670
Victoria AdamsVisiting Nurse Service of New York, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-7291
Lorraine J BlockSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9496-3208
Leanne M CurrieSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-2809
Jingjing ShangSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1815-5556
Maxim TopazSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-9837
City University of New York · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAVNS Health · USSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Systems Science and Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness Research Training for Nurse Scientists (S2CER2)T32NR014205 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lusine Poghosyan, Jingjing Shang · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
Eugenie and Joseph Doyle Research Partnership Fund from Visiting Nurses Service of New YorkIntramural Pilot Grant from Columbia University School of NursingNINR NIH HHS T32 NR014205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to create and validate a natural language processing algorithm to extract wound infection-related information from nursing notes. We also estimated wound infection prevalence in homecare settings and described related patient characteristics. In this retrospective cohort study, a natural language processing algorithm was developed and validated against a gold standard testing set. Cases with wound infection were identified using the algorithm and linked to Outcome and Assessment Information Set data to identify related patient characteristics. The final version of the natural language processing vocabulary contained 3914 terms and expressions related to the presence of wound infection. The natural language processing algorithm achieved overall good performance (F-measure = 0.88). The presence of wound infection was documented for 1.03% (n = 602) of patients without wounds, for 5.95% (n = 3232) of patients with wounds, and 19.19% (n = 152) of patients with wound-related hospitalisation or emergency department visits. Diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and skin ulcer were significantly associated with wound infection among homecare patients. Our findings suggest that nurses frequently document wound infection-related information. The use of natural language processing demonstrated that valuable information can be extracted from nursing notes which can be used to improve our understanding of the care needs of people receiving homecare. By linking findings from clinical nursing notes with additional structured data, we can analyse related patients' characteristics and use them to develop a tailored intervention that may potentially lead to reduced wound infection-related hospitalizations.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingWound InfectionAlgorithmsHumansPrevalenceRetrospective Studieshome health carenatural language processing (NLP)nursing notesOutcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS)wound infection

Identifiers

PMID34105873
PMCPMC8684883
OpenAlexW3169418231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.