Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105312›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2021

Optimizing the Start Time of Biologics in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Treatment Plans.

Yukiko Kimura, Laura E Schanberg, George A Tomlinson, Mary Ellen Riordan, Anne C Dennos, Vincent Del Gaizo, Katherine L Murphy, Pamela F Weiss, Marc D Natter, Brian M Feldman and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yukiko KimuraJoseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital and Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0001-7132-3390
Laura E SchanbergDuke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
George A TomlinsonUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mary Ellen RiordanJoseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital and Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Anne C DennosDuke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Vincent Del GaizoChildhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA), Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Katherine L MurphyLouisiana Department of Health, Office of Public Health, New Orleans.
Pamela F WeissChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9724-0443
Marc D NatterBoston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Brian M FeldmanThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah RingoldSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-8660-0207
CARRA STOP-JIA Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe optimal time to start biologics in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) remains uncertain. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) developed 3 consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for untreated polyarticular JIA to compare strategies for starting biologics.

methodsStart Time Optimization of Biologics in Polyarticular JIA (STOP-JIA) was a prospective, observational, CARRA Registry study comparing the effectiveness of 3 CTPs: 1) the step-up plan (initial nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD] monotherapy, adding a biologic if needed, 2) the early combination plan (DMARD and biologic started together), and 3) the biologic first plan (biologic monotherapy). The primary outcome measure was clinically inactive disease according to the provisional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, without glucocorticoids, at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and mobility scores, inactive disease as defined by the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (JADAS-10), and the ACR Pediatric 70 criteria (Pedi 70).

resultsOf 400 patients enrolled, 257 (64%) began the step-up plan, 100 (25%) the early combination plan, and 43 (11%) the biologic first plan. After propensity score weighting and multiple imputation, clinically inactive disease according to the ACR criteria was achieved in 37% of those on the early combination plan, 32% on the step-up plan, and 24% on the biologic first plan (P = 0.17). Inactive disease according to the clinical JADAS-10 (score ≤2.5) was also achieved in more patients on the early combination plan than the step-up plan (59% versus 43%; P = 0.03), as was ACR Pedi 70 (81% versus 62%; P = 0.008), but generalizability was limited by missing data. PROMIS measures improved in all groups, but without significant differences. Twenty serious adverse events were reported (mostly infections).

conclusionAchievement of clinically inactive disease without glucocorticoids did not significantly differ between groups at 12 months. While there was a significantly higher likelihood of early combination therapy achieving inactive disease according to the clinical JADAS-10 and ACR Pedi 70, these results require further exploration.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileBiological ProductsAdolescentChildConsensus Statements as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleHumansTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID34105312
PMCPMC8518909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.