Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105213›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Long-term follow-up assessment of opioid use outcomes among individuals with comorbid mental disorders and opioid use disorder treated with buprenorphine or methadone in a randomized clinical trial.

Yih-Ing Hser, Yuhui Zhu, Zhe Fei, Larissa J Mooney, Elizabeth A Evans, Annemarie Kelleghan, Abigail Matthews, Caroline Yoo, Andrew J Saxon

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Timing of treatment for opioid use disorder among birthing people.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yih-Ing HserDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5809-739X
Yuhui ZhuDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Zhe FeiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Larissa J MooneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Elizabeth A EvansDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-9957
Annemarie KelleghanDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Abigail MatthewsEmmes Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA.
Caroline YooDepartment of Health Policy and Management at the Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andrew J SaxonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, WA, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3880-2589
University of California, Los Angeles · USEmmes (United States) · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK: PACIFIC NORTHWEST NODEU10DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DONOVAN, DENNIS MICHAEL, ROLL, JOHN M. · 2001 to 2015
$25.5M
Clinical Trials Network: Pacific Northwest Node (CTN-0082, -0131, -0139 and dissemination library)UG1DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mary Akiko Hatch, John M. Roll · 2015 to 2026
$19.8M
Greater Southern California Node of the Clinical Trials NetworkUG1DA049435 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YIH-ING HSER · 2019 to 2026
$16.7M
Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A., FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013714NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013714NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA049435NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate whether reduction in opioid use differs when treated by either buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP) or methadone (MET) among adults with comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD) and mental disorders. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsIn a randomized controlled trial, adults with OUD were randomized to 24 weeks of either BUP or MET treatment and were followed up in 3-yearly assessments. The present secondary analyses were based on 597 participants who completed all assessments. MEASUREMENTS: The outcome measure was the number of days of using opioids per month during the follow-up period. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used to classify participants into three groups: life-time mood disorder (n = 302), life-time mental disorder other than mood disorder (n = 114) and no mental disorder (n = 181). Medication treatment (BUP, MET, no treatment) during the follow-up period was a time-varying predictor.

findingsBased on zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) mixed regression analysis, it was found that relative to no treatment, opioid use during the follow-up was significantly reduced by BUP [odds ratio (OR) = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07-0.21 for any use; risk ratio (RR) = 0.77, 95% CI =0.66-0.89 for days of use] and by MET [OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.25-0.45 for any use; RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.72-0.84 for days of use]. Relative to MET, BUP was associated with a lower likelihood of any opioid use among participants with mood disorders (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.74) and for participants without mental disorder (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.21-0.66) and fewer number of days using opioids (RR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.25-0.56) among participants with other mental disorders.

conclusionsAmong adults with comorbid opioid use disorder and mental disorders, treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone produced greater reductions in opioid use than treatment with methadone.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationFollow-Up StudiesHumansMethadoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationMethadoneNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphinecomorbiditylongitudinalmental health disordermethadoneopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID34105213
PMCPMC8710136
OpenAlexW3170670183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.