Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105205›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2021

Liquid Biopsy in Glioblastoma Management: From Current Research to Future Perspectives.

Lidia Gatto, Enrico Franceschi, Vincenzo Di Nunno, Alicia Tosoni, Raffaele Lodi, Alba Ariela Brandes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood derived extracellular vesicles in patients with glioblastoma: preliminary experience from a monoinstitutional series.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lidia GattoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico FranceschiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo Di NunnoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alicia TosoniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Raffaele LodiIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Bologna, Italy.
Alba Ariela BrandesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system. Arising from neuroepithelial glial cells, GBM is characterized by invasive behavior, extensive angiogenesis, and genetic heterogeneity that contributes to poor prognosis and treatment failure. Currently, there are several molecular biomarkers available to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes; however, all require the biopsy of tumor tissue. Nevertheless, a tissue sample from a single location has its own limitations, including the risk related to the procedure and the difficulty of obtaining longitudinal samples to monitor treatment response and to fully capture the intratumoral heterogeneity of GBM. To date, there are no biomarkers in blood or cerebrospinal fluid for detection, follow-up, or prognostication of GBM. Liquid biopsy offers an attractive and minimally invasive solution to support different stages of GBM management, assess the molecular biology of the tumor, identify early recurrence and longitudinal genomic evolution, predict both prognosis and potential resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and allow patient selection for targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge regarding the application of liquid biopsy in glioblastoma, highlighting both benefits and obstacles to translation into clinical care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To translate liquid biopsy into clinical practice, further prospective studies are required with larger cohorts to increase specificity and sensitivity. With the ever-growing interest in RNA nanotechnology, microRNAs may have a therapeutic role in brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsBiomarkerCirculating microRNACirculating tumor cellsCirculating tumor DNAGlioblastomaLiquid biopsyMicrovesciclesPredictivePrognostic

Identifiers

PMID34105205
PMCPMC8488799
OpenAlexW3172025073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.