Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105113›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2021

Improving health through multisectoral collaboration: enablers and barriers.

Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan, Lise Gauvin, Allap Judge, Daniel Fuller, Rachel Engler-Stringer, Nazeem Muhajarine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob Albin Korem AlhassanDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-0612
Lise GauvinÉcole de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-1307
Allap JudgeSchool of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Daniel FullerSaskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2015-2955
Rachel Engler-StringerDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Nazeem MuhajarineDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada. nazeem.muhajarine@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6781-5421

Funding

CIHR IP2 - 150710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMultisectoral partnerships (MPs) are increasingly viewed as an excellent strategy for promoting population health, although the Canadian evidence on MPs remains scant. The objective of this research was to identify enablers and barriers to multisectoral collaboration across three MPs (focused on food systems, urban development, and active transportation) in a Canadian urban centre.

methodsThis study is part of a pan-Canadian research program-MUSE (Multisectoral Urban Systems for health and Equity in Canadian cities). A qualitative case study methodology was used to explore enablers and barriers to collaboration among three MPs in a mid-sized Canadian city. Key strategy documents of the MPs and 13 in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders from each MP. Interview data were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 software, with rigour ensured through member checking.

resultsEnablers to collaboration included agenda and goal alignment among partners, quality of relationships in MPs, and external enabling factors. Barriers to multisectoral collaboration included agenda and priority differences, factors related to partnership structure, constitution and processes, and external barriers. Based on these factors, we developed a multisectoral collaboration matrix that dichotomizes enablers and barriers into intrinsic/internal and extrinsic/external to increase understanding of health-promoting MPs in Canada.

conclusionVarious enablers and barriers promote or inhibit multisectoral partnerships. By casting these factors into a matrix, members of ongoing or emerging MPs could take advantage of the factors that promote their work and are in their control (intrinsic enablers) or outside their control (extrinsic enablers) while working to overcome challenges presented by collaboration barriers.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchCanadaHumansHealthy built environmentsHealthy eatingIntersectoral collaborationMultisectoral partnershipsPhysical activityPublic healthPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID34105113
PMCPMC8651820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.