Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105108›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Needs for Cancer Education In Oman Based on the Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Sultan Al Balushi, Yuthar Al Rawahi, Wahid Al Kharusi, Bassim Al Bahrani, Khalid Al Baimani, Jane Meza, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Robert M Chamberlain, Amr S Soliman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing and Maintaining a Global Research Training Infrastructure for Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sultan Al BalushiMinistry of Health, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Yuthar Al RawahiThe Oman Cancer Associations (OCA), Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Wahid Al KharusiThe Oman Cancer Associations (OCA), Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Bassim Al BahraniThe National Oncology Center, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Khalid Al BaimaniOncology Unit, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Jane MezaDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Marilyn A RoubidouxDivision of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Robert M ChamberlainDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Amr S SolimanDepartment of Community Health and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, City University of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA. asoliman@med.cuny.edu.
City University of New York · USMinistry of Health · OMSultan Qaboos University Hospital · OMUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most breast cancers in Oman are diagnosed at advanced stages and therefore early detection is important. The Oman Cancer Association (OCA) initiated a mobile mammography program in 2009, but no studies have evaluated its impact. This study aimed at estimating the proportion and predictors of OCA-screened women who had repeated mammography (adherence) and the sensitivity and specificity of the program. Demographic, screening, diagnosis, and treatment data of 13,079 women screened in the OCA mammography clinic from 2009 to 2016, and medical records of all breast cancer patients seen at Royal and Sultan Qaboos University hospitals during the same period were retrieved. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of adherence. A total of 8278 screened women over age 42 years (median age of 50 ± 8 years) were included in the study. Only 18% of initially negative screened women were compliant with recommended subsequent screening. Predictors of adherence included age (50-69 years), family history of cancer, family history of breast cancer, and breast self-examination. The overall cancer detection rate was 4.1/1000 screened women. Positive predictive value of screening was 4.7% with a sensitivity rate of 53% and specificity of 92%. This study showed a low mammography adherence among previously screened women. The study revealed low sensitivity, high specificity, and an acceptable cancer detection rate. Future programs should focus on improving data collection of screened women, maintaining the linkage of databases of screening and treatment clinics, and developing guidelines for breast cancer screening in Oman. The recommendations based on the study results should be incorporated into future professional, patient, and public cancer education programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOmanAdherenceBreast cancerCancer educationOmanPredictorsScreening

Identifiers

PMID34105108
OpenAlexW3166172840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.