Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34105044›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Variations in methyl bromide concentration with distance and time during quarantine fumigation.

Min-Goo Park, Young-Seoub Hong, Chung Gyoo Park, Dong-Chul Gu, Hyoung-Ho Mo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min-Goo ParkDepartment of Plant Quarantine, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Gimcheon, 39660, Republic of Korea.
Young-Seoub HongDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Chung Gyoo ParkInstitute of Agriculture and Life Science (BK21+ Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Chul GuDepartment of Public Health, Medical Graduate School, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung-Ho MoDepartment of Plant Quarantine, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Gimcheon, 39660, Republic of Korea. era95@naver.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-787X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methyl bromide (MB) is a highly toxic and ozone-depleting substance and should be replaced. Worker exposure to high MB concentrations during fumigation has been previously reported. However, variations in MB concentration as a function of distance from fumigated objects or of time after degassing have not been reported so far. In this study, air samples were collected at various distances from fumigated objects (oranges, wood in containers, and wood in tarpaulin) during injection and degassing and analyzed via gas chromatography according to the Occupational Safety and Health Agency method. In addition, MB concentrations were directly measured over time using a gas detector during degassing. Non-linear regression analysis of the logarithmically transformed data indicated a clear decrease in MB concentration with distance as well as time. Non-linear regression models were constructed to describe the decrease in MB concentration with distance from the objects and with time during degassing (P < 0.05 for all models). The results of this study could aid in establishing appropriate safety guidelines, and hence, in preventing risks related to MB exposure.

Indexed as

FumigationHydrocarbons, BrominatedEnvironmental MonitoringQuarantineHydrocarbons, Brominatedmethyl bromideDeclining trendsEnvironmental monitoringExposure assessmentExposure modelingFumigation workers

Identifiers

PMID34105044
PMCPMC8263420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.