Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104986›Full record

ArticleReviews of environmental contamination and toxicology2021

Ecotoxicology of Glyphosate, Its Formulants, and Environmental Degradation Products.

Jose Luis Rodríguez-Gil, Ryan S Prosser, Stephen O Duke, Keith R Solomon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose Luis Rodríguez-GilIISD - Experimental Lakes Area, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. jlrodriguez@iisd-ela.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9325-9131
Ryan S ProsserSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-5748
Stephen O DukeNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-5168
Keith R SolomonCentre for Toxicology, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-6413
University of Guelph · CAInternational Institute for Sustainable Development · CAUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemical and biological properties of glyphosate are key to understanding its fate in the environment and potential risks to non-target organisms. Glyphosate is polar and water soluble and therefore does not bioaccumulate, biomagnify, or accumulate to high levels in the environment. It sorbs strongly to particles in soil and sediments and this reduces bioavailability so that exposures to non-target organisms in the environment are acute and decrease with half-lives in the order of hours to a few days. The target site for glyphosate is not known to be expressed in animals, which reduces the probability of toxicity and small risks. Technical glyphosate (acid or salts) is of low to moderate toxicity; however, when mixed with some formulants such as polyoxyethylene amines (POEAs), toxicity to aquatic animals increases about 15-fold on average. However, glyphosate and the formulants have different fates in the environment and they do not necessarily co-occur. Therefore, toxicity tests on formulated products in scenarios where they would not be used are unrealistic and of limited use for assessment of risk. Concentrations of glyphosate in surface water are generally low with minimal risk to aquatic organisms, including plants. Toxicity and risks to non-target terrestrial organisms other than plants treated directly are low and risks to terrestrial invertebrates and microbial processes in soil are very small. Formulations containing POEAs are not labeled for use over water but, because POEA rapidly partitions into sediment, risks to aquatic organisms from accidental over-sprays are reduced in shallow water bodies. We conclude that use of formulations of glyphosate under good agricultural practices presents a de minimis risk of direct and indirect adverse effects in non-target organisms.

Indexed as

HerbicidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsAquatic OrganismsEcotoxicologyGlycineGlyphosateGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdjuvantsAMPAEcotoxicologyEnvironmental fateGlyphosatePOEA

Identifiers

PMID34104986
OpenAlexW3165994614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.