Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104719›Full record

ArticleSurgery journal (New York, N.Y.)2021

Perceptions of the Health Care Workers about the Guideline Implemented for Safe Surgical Practice during COVID-19 Pandemic in a University Teaching Hospital.

Subramania Iyer, Sobha Subramaniam, Krishnakumar Thankappan, Nageswara Rao, Dipu Satyapalan, Beena Ravikumar, Anu Vasudevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Subramania IyerDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1440-4500
Sobha SubramaniamDepartment of Pulmonology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-1480
Krishnakumar ThankappanDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-0422
Nageswara RaoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3252-7651
Dipu SatyapalanDepartment of Infection Control, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-9900
Beena RavikumarDepartment of Medical Administration, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2850-5732
Anu VasudevanDepartment of Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4008-9997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One area of health care delivery that has been affected badly in most of the institutions is the running of the surgical services. This is due to various factors such as the presence of asymptomatic carrier stage, increased morbidity and mortality in surgical procedures in a COVID-19 patient, and possible transmission of disease to the health care workers (HCWs). A guideline was formulated in our institution, which is a tertiary care university teaching hospital to resume the surgical activities in full. Following its implementation, a questionnaire-based study was conducted to understand the perception of the HCWs about the guidelines. The questionnaire had four domains with questions related to the impact of the epidemic on the practices, composition of the guidelines, its implementation, and effects. There were 217 responders which included doctors and the supportive staff. Majority of the responders welcomed the introduction of the guidelines, and felt that it ensured patient's safety and helped streamline the services. Quarantine and preoperative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing were found to be appropriate measures by the respondents. In some areas, there was a difference in the responses from the doctors to that from the supportive group which assumed statistical significance. These included the reason for drop in patient numbers was the reduced patient accessibility which was felt mainly by the doctors. The doctors perceived a delay in carrying out the work, increased workload, and mental agony due to the presence of the guidelines.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicguidelinessurgery

Identifiers

PMID34104719
PMCPMC8175121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.