Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104670›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Early Stepdown From Echinocandin to Fluconazole Treatment in Candidemia: A Post Hoc Analysis of Three Cohort Studies.

E Moreno-García, P Puerta-Alcalde, G Gariup, M Fernández-Ruiz, L E López Cortés, G Cuervo, M Salavert, P Merino, M Machado, J Guinea and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Invasive Candidiasis in the Intensive Care Unit: Where Are We Now?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  8. Unresolved issues in the diagnosis of catheter related candidemia: A position paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

E Moreno-GarcíaHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
P Puerta-AlcaldeHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2490-0217
G GariupHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M Fernández-RuizHospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas+12), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
L E López CortésUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, CSIC, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Seville, Spain.
G CuervoHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL (Institut D'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M SalavertHospital Universitari i Politecnic "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
P MerinoHospital Universitario Clínico "San Carlos", Madrid, Spain.
M MachadoHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
J GuineaHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
J García-RodríguezHospital Universitario "La Paz", Madrid, Spain.
J Garnacho-MonteroUnidad Clínica de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario "Virgen Macarena", Sevilla, Spain.
C CardozoHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J PemanHospital Universitari i Politecnic "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
M MontejoHospital Universitario "Cruces", Bilbao, Spain.
J FortúnHospital Universitario "Ramón y Cajal", Madrid, Spain.
B AlmiranteHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
C CastroHospital Universitario de Valme, Sevilla, Spain.
J Rodríguez-BañoUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, CSIC, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-9001
J M AguadoHospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas+12), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
J A MartínezHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J CarratalàHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL (Institut D'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
A SorianoHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9374-0811
C Garcia-VidalHospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-0683
Universitat de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital Universitario de Valme · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no clear criteria for antifungal de-escalation after initial empirical treatments. We hypothesized that early de-escalation (ED) (within 5 days) to fluconazole is safe in fluconazole-susceptible candidemia with controlled source of infection.

methodsThis is a multicenter post hoc study that included consecutive patients from 3 prospective candidemia cohorts (2007-2016). The impact of ED and factors associated with mortality were assessed.

resultsOf 1023 candidemia episodes, 235 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 54 (23%) were classified as the ED group and 181 (77%) were classified as the non-ED group. ED was more common in catheter-related candidemia (51.9% vs 31.5%;

conclusionsEarly de-escalation is a safe strategy in patients with candidemia caused by fluconazole-susceptible strains with controlled source of bloodstream infection and hemodynamic stability. These results are important to apply antifungal stewardship strategies.

Indexed as

antifungalcandidemiade-escalationinvasive candidiasisoutcome

Identifiers

PMID34104670
PMCPMC8180243
OpenAlexW3162766254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.