ArticleCureus2021
Treatment of Midshaft Humerus Fractures Using Early Functional Bracing: Results and Prognostic Factors.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Our study tests the hypothesis that a new radiographic measurement, the fracture displacement index (FDI), is associated with the prediction of successful conservative treatment, and investigates factors, that contribute to failure treatment. Methods This was a retrospective case series reporting the results of pragmatic treatment of midshaft humerus fractures using a humeral brace. Details regarding the patient demographics and fracture pattern were recorded. The outcome was measured as patient satisfaction, return to activities, and need for further treatment at a minimum of one year from the discharge date. Results Of the 33 surviving patients, who met the inclusion criteria, two subgroups were developed. The conservatively treated brace group (n=23, 70%) and the surgical group (n=10, 30%). The median age of brace group patients was 48.3 years, significantly less (p=0.0025) than the surgical (72 years). There were no significant differences in the rest of both group demographics. On the first available x-ray after the brace application, there was a significant difference in FDI (p=0.001) between groups. Residual angulation was significantly better for the surgical group. Skin breakdown was the most common complication, followed by forearm swelling. Stiffness was common in both groups. Conclusion Patients with FDI near 50 younger than 60 years have better chances to proceed to union if treated with brace less than 24 hours after the injury. Patients with FDI larger than 100, older than 78, have a higher risk of requiring surgery. All patients should be counseled about the risk for skin complications and developing forearm swelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.