Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104553›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2021

'I felt less alone knowing I could contribute to the forum': psychological distress and use of an online infertility peer support forum.

Siobhan Bernadette Laura O'Connell, Eden Noah Gelgoot, Paul Henry Grunberg, Joy Schinazi, Deborah Da Costa, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Zeev Rosberger, Phyllis Zelkowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siobhan Bernadette Laura O'ConnellSir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Eden Noah GelgootSir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Paul Henry GrunbergSir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Joy SchinaziSir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Deborah Da CostaDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Cindy-Lee DennisLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Zeev RosbergerLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-1909
Phyllis ZelkowitzDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeelings of loss, shame and stigmatization, reduced quality of life, isolation and loneliness are common among men and women with infertility. Fertility patients may seek peer mentoring and support, specifically through the use of online forums, to fulfil their needs for shared experience and guidance through the fertility treatment process.

objectiveTo assess the use and benefits of an online fertility-related peer support forum through two research questions: (1) do socio-demographics, stress, and anxiety differ between posters on the forum, lurkers who read messages but did not post, and people who chose not to use it?; and (2) how did forum users describe their experiences?

designA sample of 220 male and female fertility patients aged 23-54 years old (M = 35.51, SD = 4.94) were recruited at fertility clinics in Montreal and Toronto, Canada, to test a mobile application called '

main outcome measuresPsychological distress was measured through the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale. Experiences using the forum were assessed through open-ended questions and in-depth interviews.

resultsParticipants with heightened psychological distress were more likely to become posters rather than lurkers or non-users and reported less distress after using the forum. Forum users appreciated the opportunity to share their experiences with others in similar situations.

conclusionThe forum reduced loneliness and allowed participants to learn new ways to manage stress. It was particularly beneficial for those with heightened psychological distress.

Indexed as

Infertilitymixed-methodsonline forumspeer supportpsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID34104553
PMCPMC8158233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.