Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104384›Full record

Articlei-Perception

The Modulation of Exogenous Attention on Emotional Audiovisual Integration.

Yueying Li, Zimo Li, Aihui Deng, Hewu Zheng, Jianxin Chen, Yanna Ren, Weiping Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yueying LiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan, China; Graduate School of Humanities, Kobe University, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-3423
Zimo Li
Aihui Deng
Hewu Zheng
Jianxin ChenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.
Yanna RenDepartment of Psychology, Medical Humanities College, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6760-7419
Weiping YangDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan, China; Brain and Cognition Research Center (BCRC), Faculty of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-2173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although emotional audiovisual integration has been investigated previously, whether emotional audiovisual integration is affected by the spatial allocation of visual attention is currently unknown. To examine this question, a variant of the exogenous spatial cueing paradigm was adopted, in which stimuli varying by facial expressions and nonverbal affective prosody were used to express six basic emotions (happiness, anger, disgust, sadness, fear, surprise) via a visual, an auditory, or an audiovisual modality. The emotional stimuli were preceded by an unpredictive cue that was used to attract participants' visual attention. The results showed significantly higher accuracy and quicker response times in response to bimodal audiovisual stimuli than to unimodal visual or auditory stimuli for emotional perception under both valid and invalid cue conditions. The auditory facilitation effect was stronger than the visual facilitation effect under exogenous attention for the six emotions tested. Larger auditory enhancement was induced when the target was presented at the expected location than at the unexpected location. For emotional perception, happiness shared the biggest auditory enhancement among all six emotions. However, the influence of exogenous cueing effect on emotional perception seemed to be absent.

Indexed as

audiovisual stimulicrossmodal integrationemotionexogenous attention

Identifiers

PMID34104384
PMCPMC8167015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.