Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104300›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2021

Quality of vital sign monitoring during obstetric hospitalizations at a regional referral and teaching hospital in Uganda: an opportunity for improvement.

Godfrey Rwambuka Mugyenyi, Joseph Ngonzi, Blair Johnson Wylie, Jessica Elizabeth Haberer, Adeline Adwoa Boatin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Godfrey Rwambuka MugyenyiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Joseph NgonziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Blair Johnson WylieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica Elizabeth HabererHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Adeline Adwoa BoatinHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCenter for Global Health · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Household air pollution in Tanzania, placental health and pregnancy outcomeK23ES021471 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WYLIE, BLAIR JOHNSON · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
Wireless Physiologic Monitoring in Postpartum Women in rural UgandaK23HD097300 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOATIN, ADELINE ADWOA · 2018 to 2022
$863k
Optimizing mHealth for adherence monitoring and interventionK24MH114732 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HABERER, JESSICA ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2021
$800k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD097300NIEHS NIH HHS K23 ES021471NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH114732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionvital sign monitoring is a key component of safe facility-based obstetric care. We aimed to assess quality of care around vital sign monitoring during obstetric hospitalizations in a tertiary-care facility in a resource-limited setting.

methodsretrospective review of obstetric records at a tertiary care facility. We assessed documentation of vital signs including fetal and maternal heart rate, and maternal blood pressure, temperature, oxygen saturation and urine output. The primary outcome was the quality of vital sign monitoring (high- versus low-quality based on frequency of monitoring). We compared quality of monitoring with timing of admission, presence of complication, and delivery mode using chi-squared tests.

resultsamong 360 records of obstetric admissions (94% of a planned random sample), 96% documented a delivery. Of these, 8% of pregnant women and 11% of postpartum women had high-quality vital sign monitoring documented on initial evaluation at admission. For women delivering during the hospitalization, 0.8% of women delivering had high-quality monitoring in the first four hours postpartum, with higher rates of high-quality monitoring in women delivering vaginally compared to those delivered by cesarean (1.4% versus 0%, p<0.001). There were no differences in rates of quality monitoring by time of admission, or obstetric complication.

conclusionvery few obstetric hospitalizations had high-quality vital sign monitoring. Attention towards improving vital sign monitoring is a critical need.

Indexed as

HospitalizationVital SignsCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPregnancyQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersUgandachildbirthlabor and deliverypostpartum carequality of careVital sign monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34104300
PMCPMC8164430
OpenAlexW3137209751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.