Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104028›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2021

Best Practices in Specialized Amyloidosis Centers in the United States: A Survey of Cardiologists, Nurses, Patients, and Patient Advocates.

Jose Nativi-Nicolau, Nitasha Sarswat, Johana Fajardo, Muriel Finkel, Younos Abdulsattar, Adam Castaño, Lori Klein, Alexandra Haddad-Angulo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient-reported satisfaction with telemedicine in light chain (AL) amyloidosis care.Amyloid : the international journal of experimental and clinical investigation : the official journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jose Nativi-NicolauUtah Amyloidosis Program, University of Utah Health and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Nitasha SarswatUniversity of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Johana FajardoMedical University of South Carolina Heart and Vascular Center, Charleston, SC, USA.
Muriel FinkelAmyloidosis Support Groups, Wood Dale, IL, USA.
Younos AbdulsattarPfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Adam CastañoPfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Lori KleinBench Wing, Greenwich, CT, USA.
Alexandra Haddad-AnguloPfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USAmyloidosis Foundation · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, referral of patients with known or suspected disease to specialized amyloidosis centers is recommended. These centers have developed strategic practices to provide multidisciplinary comprehensive care, but their best practices have not yet been well studied as a group.

methodsA qualitative survey was conducted by telephone/email from October 2019 to February 2020 among eligible healthcare providers with experience in the management of ATTR-CM at US amyloidosis centers, patients with ATTR-CM treated at amyloidosis centers, and patient advocates from amyloidosis patient support groups.

resultsFifteen cardiologists and 9 nurse practitioners/nurses from 15 selected amyloidosis centers participated in the survey, with 16 patients and 4 patient advocates. Among participating healthcare providers, the most frequently cited center best practices were diagnostic capability, multidisciplinary care, and time spent on patient care; the greatest challenges involved coordination of patient care. Patients described the "ideal" amyloidosis program as one that provides physicians with expertise in ATTR-CM, sufficient time with patients, comprehensive patient care, and opportunities to participate in research/clinical trials. The majority of centers host patient support group meetings, and patient advocacy groups provide support for centers with physician/patient education and research.

conclusionsAmyloidosis centers offer comprehensive care based on staff expertise in ATTR-CM, a multidisciplinary approach, advanced diagnostics, and time dedicated to patient care and education. Raising awareness of amyloidosis centers' best practices among healthcare providers can reinforce the benefits of early referral and comprehensive care for patients with ATTR-CM.

Indexed as

Amyloidcardiomyopathydiagnosisheart failurerare diseasetransthyretintreatment

Identifiers

PMID34104028
PMCPMC8165818
OpenAlexW3169762813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.