ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2021
Avitene™ Microfibrillar Collagen Hemostat for Adjunctive Hemostasis in Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07788846 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-Blinded, Three-Arm Clinical Trial Comparing Fibrillar Type-I Collagen Haemostat, Bone Wax, and Standardized Compression for Control of Cancellous Bone Marrow Bleeding Following Single-Ray Amputation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-Blinded, Three-Arm Clinical Trial Comparing Fibrillar Type-I Collagen Haemostat, Bone Wax, and Standardized Compression for Control of Cancellous Bone Marrow Bleeding Following Single-Ray Amputation
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of flowable microfibrillar collagen hemostat in an ovine model of lumbar laminectomy and open durotomy compared with the gelatin-thrombin hemostatic matrix and control.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Transhepatic access closure for islet cell transplant in anticoagulated patients: a comparison of microfibrillar collagen paste, coils, and coil plus gel foam.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Collagen-Based Wound Dressings: Innovations, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of postoperative dietary types on nutrition and treatment prognosis in hospitalized patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery: a comparative study.Korean journal of community nutrition · 2024Article
- Temporary Embolic Agents.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024Review
- REGECEL (an Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose) Provides Superior Bioactivity Effect on Microorganisms.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Hemostatic Applications: A Review of Recent Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Embolic Agents: Particles.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023Review
- Viable tendon neotissue from adult adipose-derived multipotent stromal cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Flowable Collagen Hemostat Evaluated in Preclinical Models of Liver Injury and Spinal Cord Exposure.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Collagen as a Biomaterial for Skin and Corneal Wound Healing.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adequate hemostasis during surgical procedures is essential for successful patient outcomes and reduced healthcare resource utilization. Topical hemostatic agents can act as catalysts for the clotting cascade or as a scaffold to promote platelet activation or aggregation. Although an ever-increasing number of topical absorbable hemostatic agents are now available for perioperative use, health care providers are disadvantaged by the lack of comparative data on feasibility, clinical effectiveness, advantages, and limitations of each in specific surgical settings. This knowledge is important for appropriate product choice when patient characteristics, type of surgical procedure, type of bleeding, and product availability may differ widely. This manuscript provides the first comprehensive overview of Avitene™ Microfibrillar Collagen Hemostat (MCH), a bovine collagen-based absorbable hemostat that has been widely used for over four decades in the United States and abroad. MCH is indicated as an adjunct to hemostasis across a broad spectrum of surgical specialties and has been shown to achieve hemostasis with positive patient outcomes and a favorable safety profile in many applications, including hepatic, orthopedic, splenic, oral, and otolaryngologic surgery. Although published clinical data regarding the use of MCH in cardiovascular surgery is limited, evidence suggests moderate use in this specialty. The information contained in this systematic review will help health care providers understand the clinical use and effectiveness of the product to determine appropriate use in differing bleeding scenarios across multiple surgical specialties. Future studies may include comparative functional and cost analyses to explore the economic advantages of using absorbable hemostatic agents compared with each other or with conventional techniques of hemostasis, when appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.