Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34104002›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2021

Current Knowledge on Endometriosis Etiology: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Lyudmila M Mikhaleva, Victor E Radzinsky, Mekan R Orazov, Tatyana N Khovanskaya, Anastasia V Sorokina, Sergey A Mikhalev, Snezhana V Volkova, Victoria B Shustova, Mikhail Y Sinelnikov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lyudmila M MikhalevaLaboratory of Clinical Morphology, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
Victor E RadzinskyPeoples' Friendship University (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Mekan R OrazovPeoples' Friendship University (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana N KhovanskayaLaboratory of Clinical Morphology, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia V SorokinaLaboratory of Clinical Morphology, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-8113
Sergey A MikhalevFamily Planning and Reproduction Center, Moscow, Russia.
Snezhana V VolkovaPeoples' Friendship University (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
Victoria B ShustovaLaboratory of Clinical Morphology, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail Y SinelnikovLaboratory of Clinical Morphology, Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia.
Research Institute of Human Morphology · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUScientific Center of Family Health Problems and Human Reproduction · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the mechanisms of endometriosis development, including those related to epigenetic mutations, cellular dysregulation, inflammatory processes, and oxidative stress.

methodsA systematic literature review regarding current aspects of endometriosis etiology, genesis and development was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and eLibrary databases. Keywords included endometriosis, etiology, development, genesis, associations and mechanisms. A multilingual search was performed.

resultsSeveral mechanisms underline the pathophysiological pathways for endometriosis development. Epigenetic mutations, external and internal influences, and chronic conditions have a significant impact on endometriosis development, survival and regulation. Several historically valid theories on endometriosis development were discussed, as well as updated findings.

conclusionDespite recent advances, fundamental problems in understanding endometriosis remain unresolved. The identification of unknown circulating epithelial progenitors or stem cells that are responsible for epithelial growth in both the endometrium and endometriotic foci seems to be the next step in solving these questions.

Indexed as

endometriosis etiologyendometriosis markersendometriosis progressiongenesis

Identifiers

PMID34104002
PMCPMC8179825
OpenAlexW3172256605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.