Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103995›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Postoperative Recurrence-Free Survival of Ameloblastoma.

Yao-Cheng Yang, Jun-Jie Wang, Yun Huang, Wei-Xin Cai, Qian Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yao-Cheng Yang *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Jie Wang *Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China.
Yun HuangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Xin CaiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China.
Qian TaoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmeloblastoma is a benign odontogenic neoplasm with a high local recurrence rate if the operation is not thorough. However, a useful clinical tool for the quantitative assessment of the prognosis and risk of postoperative recurrence of ameloblastoma has not yet been constructed. This study aims to develop a prognostic nomogram model for ameloblastoma of the jaw to assist surgeons in surgical decision-making. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients who underwent initial surgery for ameloblastoma in our department from October 2004 to March 2020 were enrolled and randomly divided into training and validation sets. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors, from which a nomogram for predicting 3-, 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of ameloblastoma was constructed using the training set and internally validated using the validation set. The model performance was assessed by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves.

resultsA total of 302 eligible patients with ameloblastoma were enrolled, 54 of whom were confirmed to relapse during the follow-up period of 6 to 191 months. Four independent predictors, including cortical bone perforation, root(s) resorption, WHO classification, and treatment pattern, were identified and included in the construction of a nomogram for recurrence-free survival (RFS), which showed promising calibration performance and discrimination in the training set (C-index 0.790, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.735-0.845) and the validation set (C-index 0.734, 95% CI 0.599-0.869).

conclusionA favorable nomogram was developed that accurately predicted the RFS of patients with ameloblastoma based on individual characteristics. Risk stratification using the nomogram could optimize tailored therapy and follow-up.

Indexed as

ameloblastomanomogramprognosisrecurrencerecurrence-free survival

Identifiers

PMID34103995
PMCPMC8179736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.