Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103934›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health insights2021

Potential Pitfalls in Wastewater Phosphorus Analysis and How to Avoid Them.

Praveen Rosario, Ramya Viswash, Thamayanthi Seenivasan, Sudha Ramalingam, Katelyn L Sellgren, Sonia Grego, Lena Trotochaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health insights, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Praveen RosarioRTI International India, New Delhi, India.
Ramya ViswashPSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, TN, India.
Thamayanthi SeenivasanPSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, TN, India.
Sudha RamalingamPSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, TN, India.
Katelyn L SellgrenCenter for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sonia GregoCenter for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lena TrotochaudCenter for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8816-3781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increasing adoption of nutrient discharge regulations, many research groups are stepping into new territory with phosphorus (P) measurements. Accurate reporting of P concentrations in effluent from novel wastewater treatment technologies is critical for protecting both environmental and human health. Analysis of P in wastewater is prone to pitfalls because of the (1) variety of chemical forms of P in wastewater (orthophosphate, condensed P, and organic P), (2) availability of different chemical assays for measuring different P forms, and (3) different conventions in the units for reporting P. Here, we present a case study highlighting how these pitfalls affect analysis and interpretation of P measurements. We show that, when used appropriately, commercially-available kits are indeed accurate tools for evaluating reactive P and total P concentrations. For both standard solutions and real wastewater, we systematically remove steps from the total P protocol to show how protocol deviations affect the results. While standard solutions are important for validating analytical methods, commercially-available wastewater standard solutions only contain P as orthophosphate (reactive P). We therefore demonstrate options for making a mixed-P standard solution containing acid-hydrolyzable and/or organic P compounds that can be used to validate both reactive P and total P assays.

Indexed as

non-sewered sanitationnutrient pollutiononsite treatmentphosphatephosphorusstandard solutionsWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34103934
PMCPMC8168049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.