Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103833›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study.

T Shyam, Venkatesh Selvaraj

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06174896 (Comparison of the Airway Sealing Pressures for Three Different Placement Techniques When Using Lma Proseal in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06174896 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the Airway Sealing Pressures for Three Different Placement Techniques When Using Lma Proseal in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorOndokuz Mayıs UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsAnesthesia, AirwayArmsGroup 1, Group 2, Group 3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T ShyamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachnadra Institute of Higher Education, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Venkatesh SelvarajDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachnadra Institute of Higher Education, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLaryngeal Mask Airway [LMA] insertion has become as a basic procedural skill needed for all health care providers. Search for the most successful insertion technique continues. We evaluated the success rate of the three LMA insertion techniques- standard, 90 degree rotational and 180 degree rotational technique. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 180 patients of ASA I-II aged 18-65 years undergoing open superficial surgical procedures with (LMA® Unique™ Airway, Teleflex®, Teleflex Medical Europe Ltd, Ireland) as an airway management device and with neuromuscular blocking agents, were randomly allocated to three groups, in this prospective randomized study. In the standard technique group (

resultsThe first attempt success rate in the standard technique was 83.9%, in 90 degree rotational technique was 75% and 180 degree rotational was 93.5%. The first attempt success rate was higher in 180 degree rotational group compared to 90 degree rotational group (

conclusionWe conclude that 180 degree rotational technique of LMA insertion is more successful than 90 degree rotational technique in adult patients under general anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Adultgeneral anaesthesiahealthcarehypopharynxlaryngeal mask airwaypostoperative

Identifiers

PMID34103833
PMCPMC8174429
OpenAlexW3153859736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.