ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison of analgesic requirements in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in hepatobiliary procedures: a scoping review.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Introduction of robotics in a pediatric bariatric program - advantages and opportunities.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Spinal Analgesia Versus Intravenous Low-Dose Oxycodone for Pain Management After Robotic Hysterectomy: Preliminary Results from an ERAS Institution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A Systematic Review of Ureteral Reimplantation Techniques in Endometriosis: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Robotic living donor nephrectomy is associated with reduced post-operative opioid use compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic approach.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Changes in hospital consumption of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after colorectal endometriosis surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Comparison of postoperative analgesia use between robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Beyond the learning curve: improving outcomes in Robotic myomectomy compared to laparoscopic myomectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Subjective Assessments and Serum Cortisol Levels as Risk Factors of Pain Persistence in the Late Postoperative Period in Old and Oldest-Old Patients.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsRobot-assisted surgery is advantageous in the precision of tissue handling and shorter postoperative recovery. We compared postoperative analgesic requirements in laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery in the first 24 h as our primary objective. The secondary outcomes were extubation on table, time to ambulation, and length of ICU stay. MATERIAL AND
methodsAfter approval from the ethics committee 48 patients undergoing either laparoscopic (group L [
resultsAge, weight, and types of surgery were comparable between the groups. The intraoperative opioid use was comparable between both groups but the duration of surgery was longer in group R. Postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly less in group R (
conclusionAnalgesic requirements were significantly less in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the first 24 h. The time to ambulation and length of ICU stay were shorter in the robot-assisted group in comparison to the laparoscopic group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.