ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.
Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07351227 (Comparison of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of McGRATH™ MAC and Besdata Videolaryngoscopes in the Orotracheal Intubation of Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of McGRATH™ MAC and Besdata Videolaryngoscopes in the Orotracheal Intubation of Children: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 9. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- Comparing the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Retrospective Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Video Laryngoscope System for Tracheal Intubation in Infants and Neonates.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Comparison of functional features and user experience with different types of video laryngoscopes when used on neonatal manikins.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2026Observational
- Comparative Evaluation of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Performed in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective SurgeryTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in paediatrics under general anaesthesia.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Comparison of forces applied to oropharyngeal tissues with different blades during laryngoscopy in a standard pediatric endotracheal intubation model.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Video Laryngoscopes in Simulated Neonatal Intubation: Usability Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Video vs. traditional laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation at birth or in the neonatal unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Approaches to neonatal intubation training: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Can video laryngoscopy and supplemental oxygen redefine pediatric, infant and neonatal tracheal intubation standards?Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Airway Management of Critically Ill Pediatric Patients with Suspected or Proven Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Intensivist Point of View.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2024Review
- The Effects of an Order-Assist Mobile Application on Pediatric Anesthesia Safety: An Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on video laryngoscope from 2011 to 2022.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023Review
- A Comparative Study of Video Laryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Pediatric Patients.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of C-MAC Miller blade video laryngoscope with conventional Miller blade in infants undergoing elective surgery- A prospective randomised trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- State-of-the-art management of the acutely unwell child.Anaesthesia · 2022Review
- Comparison of the UEscope Video Laryngoscope with the Traditional Direct Laryngoscope in Neonates and Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Airway management of a child with complete cleft mandible and lower lip with bifid tongue for mandibular distraction.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct laryngoscopy has remained the sole method for securing airway ever since the inception of endotracheal intubation. The recent introduction of video-laryngoscopes has brought a paradigm shift in the pratice of airway management. It is claimed that they improve the glottic view and first pass success rates in adult population. The airway management in children is more challenging than adults. The role of videolaryngoscopy for routine intubation in children is not clearly proven. This review attempts to discuss various videolaryngosocpes available for use in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.