Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103671›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Antibiotic stewardship in NICU: De-implementing routine CRP to reduce antibiotic usage in neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis.

Neetu Singh, James E Gray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of Perinatal Antibiotic Stewardship - where we are, where to go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use and utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) in neonatal early-onset sepsis: a secondary analysis of a prospective surveillance study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neetu SinghChildren's Hospital at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. neetu.singh@hitchcock.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-4789
James E GrayChildren's Hospital at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Children's Hospital at Dartmouth Hitchcock · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAntibiotic overuse is common in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We evaluated the change in antibiotic utilization rate (AUR) by eliminating routine CRP in the management of early-onset sepsis (EOS).

methodsRetrospective before-after cohort study in a Level 3B NICU. We made the following practice changes in the management of EOS: (1) stop routine CRP and (2) implement an automatic stop order (ASO) for antibiotics at 48 h. We compared the AUR, defined as any antibiotic use per 1000 patient days before and after practice change.

resultThere was an absolute reduction of 30% in AUR and a decrease in the proportion of neonates receiving antibiotics from the day of life 3-6 in postintervention period. We did not identify any case of partially treated EOS with change in practice.

conclusionElimination of routine CRP and ASO implementation for antibiotics in neonates at risk for EOS decreased AUR.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipNeonatal SepsisSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34103671
OpenAlexW3170853785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.