Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103664›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Identification of nodal micrometastasis in colorectal cancer using deep learning on annotation-free whole-slide images.

Wen-Yu Chuang, Chi-Chung Chen, Wei-Hsiang Yu, Chi-Ju Yeh, Shang-Hung Chang, Shir-Hwa Ueng, Tong-Hong Wang, Chuen Hsueh, Chang-Fu Kuo, Chao-Yuan Yeh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Yu ChuangDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-073X
Chi-Chung ChenaetherAI Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0267-7704
Wei-Hsiang YuaetherAI Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2907-8031
Chi-Ju YehDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shang-Hung ChangCenter for Big Data Analytics and Statistics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shir-Hwa UengDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tong-Hong WangTissue Bank, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-9031
Chuen HsuehDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang-Fu KuoCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-5730
Chao-Yuan YehaetherAI Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan. joeyeh@aetherai.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1947-1596
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWAletheia University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of nodal micrometastasis (tumor size: 0.2-2.0 mm) is challenging for pathologists due to the small size of metastatic foci. Since lymph nodes with micrometastasis are counted as positive nodes, detecting micrometastasis is crucial for accurate pathologic staging of colorectal cancer. Previously, deep learning algorithms developed with manually annotated images performed well in identifying micrometastasis of breast cancer in sentinel lymph nodes. However, the process of manual annotation is labor intensive and time consuming. Multiple instance learning was later used to identify metastatic breast cancer without manual annotation, but its performance appears worse in detecting micrometastasis. Here, we developed a deep learning model using whole-slide images of regional lymph nodes of colorectal cancer with only a slide-level label (either a positive or negative slide). The training, validation, and testing sets included 1963, 219, and 1000 slides, respectively. A supercomputer TAIWANIA 2 was used to train a deep learning model to identify metastasis. At slide level, our algorithm performed well in identifying both macrometastasis (tumor size > 2.0 mm) and micrometastasis with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.9993 and 0.9956, respectively. Since most of our slides had more than one lymph node, we then tested the performance of our algorithm on 538 single-lymph node images randomly cropped from the testing set. At single-lymph node level, our algorithm maintained good performance in identifying macrometastasis and micrometastasis with an AUC of 0.9944 and 0.9476, respectively. Visualization using class activation mapping confirmed that our model identified nodal metastasis based on areas of tumor cells. Our results demonstrate for the first time that micrometastasis could be detected by deep learning on whole-slide images without manual annotation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID34103664
PMCPMC8443445
OpenAlexW3167514989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.