Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103620›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparison of the sensitivity of Western blotting between PVDF and NC membranes.

Yufang Xiang, Yuanyuan Zheng, Shaobo Liu, Gang Liu, Zhi Li, Weijie Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Brief guide to western blot assays.Molecules and cells · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Chromogenic Quantification of Protein Expression in Zebrafish Larvae.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yufang Xiang *College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, 9-Western Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China.
Yuanyuan Zheng *College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, 9-Western Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China.
Shaobo LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China.
Gang LiuCollege of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, 9-Western Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China.
Zhi LiClinical Laboratory, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, 826-Xinan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, 116033, Liaoning, China.
Weijie DongCollege of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, 9-Western Section, Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China. wjdong@dmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Western blotting (WB) is one of the most widely used techniques to identify proteins as well as post translational modifications of proteins. The selection of electroblotted membrane is one of the key factors affecting the detection sensitivity of the protein which is transferred from gel to membrane in WB. The most common used membranes are polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and nitrocellulose (NC) membranes. Which membrane of these two is more suitable for WB has not been reported so far. Here, by incubating proteins which were transferred to PVDF or NC membranes with a series of antibodies and different types of lectins, we investigated the relationship between the binding ability of these two membranes to proteins or glycoproteins and the molecular weight of the target protein. The antibody re-probed ability of the two membranes was also explored. Moreover, we verified the above results by directly incubating proteins having different molecular weights onto PVDF or NC membranes. Bound proteins were stained with direct blue-71, and the staining intensity was quantitated by scanning and densitometry.

Identifiers

PMID34103620
PMCPMC8187435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.