Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs.

Pawiya Pupa, Prasert Apiwatsiri, Wandee Sirichokchatchawan, Nopadon Pirarat, Tanawong Maison, Anantawat Koontanatechanon, Nuvee Prapasarakul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic and functional insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MicroencapsulatedAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Article
  14. Impact ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Role of microencapsulatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Joint Application ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pawiya PupaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Prasert ApiwatsiriDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Wandee SirichokchatchawanCollege of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University (CPHS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Nopadon PiraratDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Tanawong MaisonFeed Research and Innovation Center, Charoen Pokphand Foods (CPF) Public Company Limited (PLC.), Chonburi, 20220, Thailand.
Anantawat KoontanatechanonFeed Research and Innovation Center, Charoen Pokphand Foods (CPF) Public Company Limited (PLC.), Chonburi, 20220, Thailand.
Nuvee PrapasarakulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Nuvee.p@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · THCharoenkrung Pracharak Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) have appeared promising as replacements for antibiotics in in vitro studies. Microencapsulation, especially by the spray-drying method, has been used to preserve their numbers and characteristics during storage and digestion. This study compared the efficacy of these strains and their microencapsulated form with antibiotic usage on growth performance, faecal microbial counts, and intestinal morphology in nursing-finishing pigs. A total of 240 healthy neonatal pigs were treated on days 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after cross-fostering. Sterile peptone water was delivered orally to the control and antibiotic groups. Spray-dried Lactobacillus plantarum strain 22F stored for 6-months was administered to piglets in the spraydry group. Three ml of each the three fresh strains (10

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnti-Bacterial AgentsBody WeightDietDietary SupplementsDrug Administration ScheduleFecesFemaleLactiplantibacillus plantarumLactobacillalesMalePediococcus acidilacticiProbioticsSwineAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34103574
PMCPMC8187408
OpenAlexW3136594694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.