Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Exposure to screens and children's language development in the EDEN mother-child cohort.

Pauline Martinot, Jonathan Y Bernard, Hugo Peyre, Maria De Agostini, Anne Forhan, Marie-Aline Charles, Sabine Plancoulaine, Barbara Heude

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Timing of food pieces introduction and neurodevelopment: findings from a nationwide birth cohort.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline Martinot *Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France.
Jonathan Y Bernard *Centre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France. jonathan.bernard@inserm.fr.
Hugo PeyreLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives Et Psycholinguistique (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Maria De AgostiniCentre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France.
Anne ForhanCentre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France.
Marie-Aline CharlesCentre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France.
Sabine PlancoulaineCentre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France.
Barbara HeudeCentre for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université de Paris, Inserm, INRAE, 16 av Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 75004, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in children have reported associations of screen time and background TV on language skills as measured by their parents. However, few large, longitudinal studies have examined language skills assessed by trained psychologists, which is less prone to social desirability. We assessed screen time and exposure to TV during family meals at ages 2, 3 and 5-6 years in 1562 children from the French EDEN cohort. Language skills were evaluated by parents at 2 years (Communicative Development Inventory, CDI) and by trained psychologists at 3 (NEPSY and ELOLA batteries) and 5-6 years (verbal IQ). Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations were assessed by linear regression adjusted for important confounders. Overall, daily screen time was not associated with language scores, except in cross-sectional at age 2 years, where higher CDI scores were observed for intermediate screen time. Exposure to TV during family meals was consistently associated with lower language scores: TV always on (vs never) at age 2 years was associated with lower verbal IQ (- 3.2 [95% IC: - 6.0, - 0.3] points), independent of daily screen time and baseline language score. In conclusion, public health policies should better account for the context of screen watching, not only its amount.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentMothersScreen TimeAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntelligenceMale

Identifiers

PMID34103551
PMCPMC8187440
OpenAlexW3170899807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.