Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Defensive freezing and its relation to approach-avoidance decision-making under threat.

Felix H Klaassen, Leslie Held, Bernd Figner, Jill X O'Reilly, Floris Klumpers, Lycia D de Voogd, Karin Roelofs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How Distributed Subcortical Integration of Reward and Threat May Inform Subsequent Approach-Avoidance Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix H KlaassenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. f.klaassen@donders.ru.nl.
Leslie HeldRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bernd FignerRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jill X O'ReillyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Floris KlumpersRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lycia D de VoogdRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karin RoelofsRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L019639/1Medical Research Council MR/T031344/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful responding to acutely threatening situations requires adequate approach-avoidance decisions. However, it is unclear how threat-induced states-like freezing-related bradycardia-impact the weighing of the potential outcomes of such value-based decisions. Insight into the underlying computations is essential, not only to improve our models of decision-making but also to improve interventions for maladaptive decisions, for instance in anxiety patients and first-responders who frequently have to make decisions under acute threat. Forty-two participants made passive and active approach-avoidance decisions under threat-of-shock when confronted with mixed outcome-prospects (i.e., varying money and shock amounts). Choice behavior was best predicted by a model including individual action-tendencies and bradycardia, beyond the subjective value of the outcome. Moreover, threat-related bradycardia (high-vs-low threat) interacted with subjective value, depending on the action-context (passive-vs-active). Specifically, in action-contexts incongruent with participants' intrinsic action-tendencies, stronger bradycardia related to diminished effects of subjective value on choice across participants. These findings illustrate the relevance of testing approach-avoidance decisions in relatively ecologically valid conditions of acute and primarily reinforced threat. These mechanistic insights into approach-avoidance conflict-resolution may inspire biofeedback-related techniques to optimize decision-making under threat. Critically, the findings demonstrate the relevance of incorporating internal psychophysiological states and external action-contexts into models of approach-avoidance decision-making.

Indexed as

FreezingAdolescentAdultAnxietyAutonomic Nervous SystemAvoidance LearningBiofeedback, PsychologyBradycardiaChoice BehaviorConflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingEmotionsFemaleHippocampusHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID34103543
PMCPMC8187589
OpenAlexW3171809340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.