Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103498›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Pump-probe X-ray holographic imaging of laser-induced cavitation bubbles with femtosecond FEL pulses.

M Vassholz, H P Hoeppe, J Hagemann, J M Rosselló, M Osterhoff, R Mettin, T Kurz, A Schropp, F Seiboth, C G Schroer and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

M VassholzInstitut für Röntgenphysik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-8782
H P HoeppeInstitut für Röntgenphysik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-5121
J HagemannCXNS - Center for X-ray and Nano Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2768-9496
J M RossellóDrittes Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-9452
M OsterhoffInstitut für Röntgenphysik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-515X
R MettinDrittes Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
T KurzDrittes Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
A SchroppCXNS - Center for X-ray and Nano Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
F SeibothCXNS - Center for X-ray and Nano Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-1338
C G SchroerCXNS - Center for X-ray and Nano Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-1200
M ScholzEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
J MöllerEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
J HallmannEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
U BoesenbergEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
C KimEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
A ZozulyaEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-3432
W LuEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
R ShaydukEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
R SchafferEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.
A MadsenEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility, Schenefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-1029
T SaldittInstitut für Röntgenphysik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. tsaldit@gwdg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-0813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cavitation bubbles can be seeded from a plasma following optical breakdown, by focusing an intense laser in water. The fast dynamics are associated with extreme states of gas and liquid, especially in the nascent state. This offers a unique setting to probe water and water vapor far-from equilibrium. However, current optical techniques cannot quantify these early states due to contrast and resolution limitations. X-ray holography with single X-ray free-electron laser pulses has now enabled a quasi-instantaneous high resolution structural probe with contrast proportional to the electron density of the object. In this work, we demonstrate cone-beam holographic flash imaging of laser-induced cavitation bubbles in water with nanofocused X-ray free-electron laser pulses. We quantify the spatial and temporal pressure distribution of the shockwave surrounding the expanding cavitation bubble at time delays shortly after seeding and compare the results to numerical simulations.

Identifiers

PMID34103498
PMCPMC8187368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.