Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103488›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies.

Paolo Gazzotti, Johannes Emmerling, Giacomo Marangoni, Andrea Castelletti, Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst, Andries Hof, Massimo Tavoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Global sensitivity analysis of integrated assessment models with multivariate outputs.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Climate change and the nonlinear impact of precipitation anomalies on income inequality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo GazzottiDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. paolo.gazzotti@polimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-5775
Johannes EmmerlingRFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0916-9913
Giacomo MarangoniDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea CastellettiDepartment of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-1498
Kaj-Ivar van der WijstPBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-7059
Andries HofPBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-5038
Massimo TavoniDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. massimo.tavoni@polimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-4707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benefit-cost analyses of climate policies by integrated assessment models have generated conflicting assessments. Two critical issues affecting social welfare are regional heterogeneity and inequality. These have only partly been accounted for in existing frameworks. Here, we present a benefit-cost model with more than 50 regions, calibrated upon emissions and mitigation cost data from detailed-process IAMs, and featuring country-level economic damages. We compare countries' self-interested and cooperative behaviour under a range of assumptions about socioeconomic development, climate impacts, and preferences over time and inequality. Results indicate that without international cooperation, global temperature rises, though less than in commonly-used reference scenarios. Cooperation stabilizes temperature within the Paris goals (1.80

Identifiers

PMID34103488
PMCPMC8187370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.