Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103398›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Language extinction triggers the loss of unique medicinal knowledge.

Rodrigo Cámara-Leret, Jordi Bascompte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Understandings and critiques of biocultural diversity conservation and future recommendations for conservation actors.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Uses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Interdependencies between Indigenous peoples, local communities, and freshwater systems in a changing Amazon.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medical ethnobotany.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biocultural diversity and crop improvement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biocultural vulnerability exposes threats of culturally important species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodrigo Cámara-LeretDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland rodrigo.camaraLeret@ieu.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-0602
Jordi BascompteDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-6411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 30% of the 7,400 languages in the world will no longer be spoken by the end of the century. So far, however, our understanding of whether language extinction may result in the loss of linguistically unique knowledge remains limited. Here, we ask to what degree indigenous knowledge of medicinal plants is associated with individual languages and quantify how much indigenous knowledge may vanish as languages and plants go extinct. Focusing on three regions that have a high biocultural diversity, we show that over 75% of all 12,495 medicinal plant services are linguistically unique-i.e., only known to one language. Whereas most plant species associated with linguistically unique knowledge are not threatened, most languages that report linguistically unique knowledge are. Our finding of high uniqueness in indigenous knowledge and strong coupling with threatened languages suggests that language loss will be even more critical to the extinction of medicinal knowledge than biodiversity loss.

Indexed as

KnowledgeLanguagePlants, MedicinalHumansPhylogenybiocultural diversityecosystem servicesindigenous languages

Identifiers

PMID34103398
PMCPMC8214696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.