Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103386›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2021

Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: the effects of progression-free interval and prior therapies on efficacy and safety in the randomized phase III trial ARIEL3.

Andrew R Clamp, Domenica Lorusso, Amit M Oza, Carol Aghajanian, Ana Oaknin, Andrew Dean, Nicoletta Colombo, Johanne I Weberpals, Giovanni Scambia, Alexandra Leary and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01968213 (A Study of Rucaparib as Switch Maintenance Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, High-Grade Serous or Endometrioid Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal or Fallopian Tube Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01968213 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of Rucaparib as Switch Maintenance Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive, High-Grade Serous or Endometrioid Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal or Fallopian Tube Cancer ( ARIEL3 )

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2014 to 2022Enrolled564ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal CancerArmsRucaparib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

Andrew R Clamp *Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Domenica Lorusso *Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies and Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy domenica.lorusso@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-0598
Amit M OzaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carol AghajanianDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ana OakninGynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrew DeanDepartment of Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Nicoletta ColomboGynecologic Cancer Program, University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Johanne I WeberpalsOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Giovanni ScambiaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Scientific Directorate, Rome, Italy.
Alexandra LearyGynecological Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Villejuif, France.
Robert W HollowayDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Margarita Amenedo GancedoMedical Oncology Department, Oncology Center of Galicia, La Coruña, Spain.
Peter C FongMedical Oncology Department, Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jeffrey C GohDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
David M O'MalleyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Deborah K ArmstrongOncology, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Susana BanerjeeGynecology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Jesus García-DonasDivision of Medical Oncology, HM Hospitales-Centro Integral Oncológico Hospital de Madrid Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
Elizabeth M SwisherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Terri CameronClinical Science, Clovis Oncology UK Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Sandra GobleBiostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Robert L ColemanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jonathan A LedermannDepartment of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3799-3539
Gynecologic Oncology Group · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INCancer Research And Biostatistics · USCentro Oncológico de Galicia · ESClovis Oncology (United Kingdom) · GBFlorida Hospital Cancer Institute · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITHM Hospitales · ESInserm · FRJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOttawa Hospital · CARoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt John of God Subiaco Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo regardless of biomarker status when used as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer. The aim of the current analyses was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rucaparib in subgroups based on progression-free interval following penultimate platinum, number of prior chemotherapies, and prior use of bevacizumab.

methodsPatients were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or placebo. Within subgroups, progression-free survival was assessed in prespecified, nested cohorts:

resultsIn the intent-to-treat population, median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 8.2 months with rucaparib versus 4.1 months with placebo (n=151 vs n=76; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.46, p<0.0001) for patients with progression-free interval 6 to ≤12 months, and 13.6 versus 5.6 months (n=224 vs n=113; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.52, p<0.0001) for those with progression-free interval >12 months. Median progression-free survival was 10.4 versus 5.4 months (n=231 vs n=124; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.54, p<0.0001) for patients who had received two prior chemotherapies, and 11.1 versus 5.3 months (n=144 vs n=65; HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.41, p<0.0001) for those who had received ≥3 prior chemotherapies. Median progression-free survival was 10.3 versus 5.4 months (n=83 vs n=43; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.68, p=0.0004) for patients who had received prior bevacizumab, and 10.9 versus 5.4 months (n=292 vs n=146; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.45, p<0.0001) for those who had not. Across subgroups, median progression-free survival was also significantly longer with rucaparib versus placebo in the

conclusionsRucaparib maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo irrespective of progression-free interval following penultimate platinum, number of lines of prior chemotherapy, and previous use of bevacizumab.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndolesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProgression-Free SurvivalIndolesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitorsrucaparibovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID34103386
PMCPMC9445915
OpenAlexW3170209696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.