Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34103326›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2021

Child health and the implementation of Community and District-management Empowerment for Scale-up (CODES) in Uganda: a randomised controlled trial.

Peter Waiswa, Flavia Mpanga, Danstan Bagenda, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Thomas O'Connell, Dorcus Kiwanuka Henriksson, Theresa Diaz, Florence Ayebare, Anne Ruhweza Katahoire, Eric Ssegujja and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peter WaiswaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda pwaiswa@musph.ac.ug.
Flavia MpangaUNICEF Uganda Country Office, Kampala, Uganda.
Danstan BagendaUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Rornald Muhumuza KananuraDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Thomas O'ConnellWorld Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Dorcus Kiwanuka HenrikssonGlobal Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Theresa DiazDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organizations, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florence AyebareDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Anne Ruhweza KatahoireChild Health and Development Centre, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Eric SsegujjaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Anthony MbonyeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Stefan Swartling PetersonDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUganda's district-level administrative units buttress the public healthcare system. In many districts, however, local capacity is incommensurate with that required to plan and implement quality health interventions. This study investigates how a district management strategy informed by local data and community dialogue influences health services.

methodsA 3-year randomised controlled trial (RCT) comprised of 16 Ugandan districts tested a management approach, Community and District-management Empowerment for Scale-up (CODES). Eight districts were randomly selected for each of the intervention and comparison areas. The approach relies on a customised set of data-driven diagnostic tools to identify and resolve health system bottlenecks. Using a difference-in-differences approach, the authors performed an intention-to-treat analysis of protective, preventive and curative practices for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea among children aged 5 and younger.

resultsIntervention districts reported significant net increases in the treatment of malaria (+23%), pneumonia (+19%) and diarrhoea (+13%) and improved stool disposal (+10%). Coverage rates for immunisation and vitamin A consumption saw similar improvements. By engaging communities and district managers in a common quest to solve local bottlenecks, CODES fostered demand for health services. However, limited fiscal space-constrained district managers' ability to implement solutions identified through CODES.

conclusionData-driven district management interventions can positively impact child health outcomes, with clinically significant improvements in the treatment of malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea as well as stool disposal. The findings recommend the model's suitability for health systems strengthening in Uganda and other decentralised contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15705788.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesMalariaChildChild HealthDelivery of Health CareHumansUgandachild healthcluster randomised trialhealth systemspublic health

Identifiers

PMID34103326
PMCPMC8189926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.