Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021
Efficacy of a Single Administration of 5% Povidone-Iodine in the Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis.
Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viral eye: Emerging insights into corneal and ocular surface viral infections.World journal of virology · 2025Review
- The Rising Importance of Antiseptics in Ophthalmology: From Endophthalmitis Prevention to Treatment of Ocular Infections.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
- An Update on Viral Conjunctivitis Treatment Strategies: A Narrative Literature Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Detection of human herpesvirus 7 in conjunctival samples collected from individuals recovering from conjunctivitis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Natural history of adenoviral conjunctivitis in a US-based population: Viral load, signs, and symptoms.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2024Article
- Unraveling the conjunctivitis crisis: understanding the spiking incidence in Karachi and Lahore-Pakistan.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Pediatric Conjunctivitis: A Review of Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In praise of povidone-iodine application in ophthalmology.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single, in-office administration of 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) compared to artificial tears (AT) for adenoviral conjunctivitis (Ad-Cs).
designDouble-masked pilot randomized trial.
methodsPatients presenting with presumed adenoviral conjunctivitis were screened at 9 U.S. clinics. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ≥18 years of age, symptoms ≤4 days, and a positive AdenoPlus test. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: thyroid disease, iodine allergy, recent ocular surgery, and ocular findings inconsistent with early-stage Ad-Cs. Randomization was to a single administration of 5% PVP-I or AT in 1 eye and examinations on days 1-2, 4, 7, 14, and 21 with conjunctival swabs taken at each visit for quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Primary outcome was percent reduction from peak viral load. Secondary outcomes were improvement in clinical signs and symptoms.
resultsOf 56 patients randomized, 28 had detectable viral titers at baseline. Day 4 posttreatment, viral titers in the 5% PVP-I and AT groups were 2.5% ± 2.7% and 14.4% ± 10.5% of peak, respectively (P = .020). Severity of participant-reported tearing, lid swelling, and redness as well as clinician-graded mucoid discharge, bulbar redness, and bulbar edema were lower in the 5% PVP-I group than AT group on day 4 (P < .05). After day 4, viral titers and severity of signs and symptoms decreased markedly in both groups and no differences between groups were detected.
conclusionsPilot data suggest a single, in-office administration of 5% PVP-I could reduce viral load and hasten improvement of clinical signs and symptoms in patients with Ad-Cs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.