Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34102008›Full record

Observational studyUnited European gastroenterology journal2021

Predictors for incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. Data from a national registry of liver disease.

Helena Cortez-Pinto, Rodrigo Liberal, Susana Lopes, Mariana V Machado, Joana Carvalho, Teresa Dias, Arsénio Santos, Cláudia Agostinho, Pedro Figueiredo, Rafaela Loureiro and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Current Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Comprehensive Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The treatment of primary biliary cholangitis: from shadow to light.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Risk Stratification in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena Cortez-PintoClínica Universitária de Gastrenterologia, Departamento de Gastrenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-8744
Rodrigo LiberalGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Susana LopesGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana V MachadoClínica Universitária de Gastrenterologia, Departamento de Gastrenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7769-7860
Joana CarvalhoClínica Universitária de Gastrenterologia, Departamento de Gastrenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
Teresa DiasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Arsénio SantosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-5223
Cláudia AgostinhoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Pedro FigueiredoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9872-6341
Rafaela LoureiroGastroenterology Department, Central Lisbon Hospital Centre, Lisboa, Portugal.
Alexandra MartinsGastroenterology Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando da Fonseca, Lisboa, Portugal.
Gonçalo AlexandrinoGastroenterology Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando da Fonseca, Lisboa, Portugal.
Isabel CotrimGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Carina LealGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
José PresaInternal Medicine Department, Liver Unit, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Mónica MesquitaInternal Medicine Department, Liver Unit, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9490-7919
Joana NunesGastroenterology Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisboa, Portugal.
Catarina GouveiaGastroenterology Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana Horta E ValeHospital da Arrábida, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Luísa AlvesGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal.
Mariana CoelhoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal.
Luís MaiaGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Isabel PedrotoGastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
António BanhudoGastroenterology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal.
João Sebastião PintoGastroenterology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal.
Marta Vargas GomesExigo Consultores, Lisboa, Portugal.
Joana OliveiraExigo Consultores, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-7771
Valeska AndreozziExigo Consultores, Lisboa, Portugal.
Filipe CalinasGastroenterology Department, Central Lisbon Hospital Centre, Lisboa, Portugal.
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTEnpro Consult (Bulgaria) · BGUniversity of Lisbon · PTCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTHospital Beatriz Ângelo · PTHospital de São Bernardo · PTHospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PTInstituto Politécnico de Leiria · PTPolytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco · PTUnidade Local de Saúde de São José · PTUnidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current standard of treatment in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), although a considerable proportion of patients show incomplete response resulting in disease progression.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of incomplete response to UDCA and determine associated patients' characteristics.

methodsPatients with PBC as main diagnosis were included from a national multicentric patient registry-Liver.pt. Main endpoints included incomplete response to UDCA treatment according to Barcelona, Paris I and Paris II criteria, Globe and UK PBC scores and the association between baseline characteristics and incomplete response according to Paris II criteria.

resultsA total of 434 PBC patients were identified, with a mean age of 55 years and 89.2% females. Nearly half of patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis and 93.2% had positive anti-mitochondrial antibodies. Almost all patients (95.6%) had been prescribed at least one drug for PBC treatment. At the last follow-up visit, 93.3% were under treatment of which 99.8% received UDCA. Incomplete response to UDCA was observed in 30.7%, 35.3%, 53.7% and 36.4% of patients according to Barcelona, Paris I, Paris II criteria and Globe score, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, and accordingly to Paris II criteria, the risk for incomplete biochemical response was 25% higher for patients with cirrhosis at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.02-1.54; p = 0.033) and 35% (95%CI:1.06-1.72; p = 0.016) and 5% (OR = 1.05; 95%CI:1.01-1.10; p = 0.013) for those with elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP).

conclusionA considerable proportion of patients showed incomplete biochemical response to UDCA treatment according to Paris II criteria. Cirrhosis, elevated GGT and ALP at diagnosis were identified as associated risk factors for incomplete response. Early identification of patients at risk of incomplete response could improve treatment care and guide clinical decision to a more careful patient monitorization.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAgedAlkaline PhosphataseFemalegamma-GlutamyltransferaseHumansLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPortugalPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesAlkaline Phosphatasegamma-GlutamyltransferaseUrsodeoxycholic AcidBarcelonaGLOBEParisPBCpredictorsprimary biliary cholangitisresponsescoreUDCAursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID34102008
PMCPMC8280809
OpenAlexW3171257323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.