ArticleMedical physics2021
Fully automated segmentation of brain tumor from multiparametric MRI using 3D context deep supervised U-Net.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of artificial intelligence for brain tumor segmentation, treatment planning, and outcome prediction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- High-precision brain tumor segmentation with switchable normalization in faster R-CNN architecture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Localization-guided segmentation of Gliomas via 3D ReFusionNet.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Detection and segmentation of brain metastases on MRI using 3D-MedDCNet.Medical physics · 2025Article
- TOPOLOGY-PRESERVING DEEP SUPERVISION FOR 3D AXON CENTERLINE SEGMENTATION USING PARTIALLY ANNOTATED DATA.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of Machine Learning for Differentiating Bone Malignancy on Imaging: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Diagnosis from Optic Disc Photographs Using a Siamese Network.Ophthalmology science · 2022Article
- The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- Multi-scale Multi-structure Siamese Network (MMSNet) for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Prediction.Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop) · 2022Article
- Automated diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma from fundus image by simulating human's grading with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Combined Features in Region of Interest for Brain Tumor Segmentation.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- Cascaded mutual enhancing networks for brain tumor subregion segmentation in multiparametric MRI.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Machine-learning based investigation of prognostic indicators for oncological outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOwing to histologic complexities of brain tumors, its diagnosis requires the use of multimodalities to obtain valuable structural information so that brain tumor subregions can be properly delineated. In current clinical workflow, physicians typically perform slice-by-slice delineation of brain tumor subregions, which is a time-consuming process and also more susceptible to intra- and inter-rater variabilities possibly leading to misclassification. To deal with this issue, this study aims to develop an automatic segmentation of brain tumor in MR images using deep learning.
methodIn this study, we develop a context deep-supervised U-Net to segment brain tumor subregions. A context block which aggregates multiscale contextual information for dense segmentation was proposed. This approach enlarges the effective receptive field of convolutional neural networks, which, in turn, improves the segmentation accuracy of brain tumor subregions. We performed the fivefold cross-validation on the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2020 training dataset. The BraTS 2020 testing datasets were obtained via BraTS online website as a hold-out test. For BraTS, the evaluation system divides the tumor into three regions: whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET). The performance of our proposed method was compared against two state-of-the-arts CNN networks in terms of segmentation accuracy via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The tumor volumes generated by our proposed method were compared with manually contoured volumes via Bland-Altman plots and Pearson analysis.
resultsThe proposed method achieved the segmentation results with a DSC of 0.923 ± 0.047, 0.893 ± 0.176, and 0.846 ± 0.165 and a 95% HD95 of 3.946 ± 7.041, 3.981 ± 6.670, and 10.128 ± 51.136 mm on WT, TC, and ET, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieved comparable to significantly (p < 0.05) better segmentation accuracies than other two state-of-the-arts CNN networks. Pearson correlation analysis showed a high positive correlation between the tumor volumes generated by proposed method and manual contour.
conclusionOverall qualitative and quantitative results of this work demonstrate the potential of translating proposed technique into clinical practice for segmenting brain tumor subregions, and further facilitate brain tumor radiotherapy workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.