Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101845›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Fully automated segmentation of brain tumor from multiparametric MRI using 3D context deep supervised U-Net.

Mingquan Lin, Shadab Momin, Yang Lei, Hesheng Wang, Walter J Curran, Tian Liu, Xiaofeng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TOPOLOGY-PRESERVING DEEP SUPERVISION FOR 3D AXON CENTERLINE SEGMENTATION USING PARTIALLY ANNOTATED DATA.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingquan LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shadab MominDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yang LeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hesheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Walter J CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tian LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Multiparametric MRI-guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy with Focal Tumor BoostR01CA215718 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215718NIH HHS R01CA215718Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOwing to histologic complexities of brain tumors, its diagnosis requires the use of multimodalities to obtain valuable structural information so that brain tumor subregions can be properly delineated. In current clinical workflow, physicians typically perform slice-by-slice delineation of brain tumor subregions, which is a time-consuming process and also more susceptible to intra- and inter-rater variabilities possibly leading to misclassification. To deal with this issue, this study aims to develop an automatic segmentation of brain tumor in MR images using deep learning.

methodIn this study, we develop a context deep-supervised U-Net to segment brain tumor subregions. A context block which aggregates multiscale contextual information for dense segmentation was proposed. This approach enlarges the effective receptive field of convolutional neural networks, which, in turn, improves the segmentation accuracy of brain tumor subregions. We performed the fivefold cross-validation on the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2020 training dataset. The BraTS 2020 testing datasets were obtained via BraTS online website as a hold-out test. For BraTS, the evaluation system divides the tumor into three regions: whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET). The performance of our proposed method was compared against two state-of-the-arts CNN networks in terms of segmentation accuracy via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The tumor volumes generated by our proposed method were compared with manually contoured volumes via Bland-Altman plots and Pearson analysis.

resultsThe proposed method achieved the segmentation results with a DSC of 0.923 ± 0.047, 0.893 ± 0.176, and 0.846 ± 0.165 and a 95% HD95 of 3.946 ± 7.041, 3.981 ± 6.670, and 10.128 ± 51.136 mm on WT, TC, and ET, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieved comparable to significantly (p < 0.05) better segmentation accuracies than other two state-of-the-arts CNN networks. Pearson correlation analysis showed a high positive correlation between the tumor volumes generated by proposed method and manual contour.

conclusionOverall qualitative and quantitative results of this work demonstrate the potential of translating proposed technique into clinical practice for segmenting brain tumor subregions, and further facilitate brain tumor radiotherapy workflow.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computerbrain tumor segmentationdeep learningsubregionU-Net

Identifiers

PMID34101845
PMCPMC11752426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.