Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101806›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors or Tamoxifen Following Chemotherapy for Perimenopausal Breast Cancer Patients.

Gwen M H E Dackus, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Gabe S Sonke, Elsken van der Wall, Paul J van Diest, Sabine Siesling, Michael Hauptmann, Sabine C Linn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Response to Klar and Adams.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gwen M H E DackusDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Katarzyna JóźwiakDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-9628
Elsken van der WallDivision Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-2745
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0273-824X
Michael HauptmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8539-0148
Sabine C LinnDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-0347
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) vs tamoxifen has been investigated in randomized clinical trials for premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with early, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. The optimal endocrine treatment for chemotherapy-treated perimenopausal women, who generally develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, is uncertain.

methodsAll Dutch women who received adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine treatment for stage I-III, ER+ (>10% positive cells), invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Included women were considered perimenopausal based on an age at diagnosis of 45 to 50 years (n = 2295). For each patient, AI treatment duration relative to total endocrine treatment duration was calculated. Predominantly tamoxifen-treated patients (AI < 25%) were compared with those receiving AI and tamoxifen for a similar duration (AI 25%-75%) and those mostly using AI (AI > 75%). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were calculated using time-dependent Cox regression.

resultsAfter an average follow-up of 7.6 years, 377 RFS events occurred. Women mostly receiving AI (AI > 75%) had the best RFS (adjusted HR = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.46 to 0.86) followed by those receiving AI 25% to 75% (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.65 to 1.12) compared with predominantly tamoxifen-treated women. Trend analyses showed that every 10% increase in AI-endocrine treatment ratio reduced RFS event risk by 5% (2-sided Ptrend = .002). In total, 236 deaths occurred; hazard ratios for overall survival showed similar trends.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the best adjuvant endocrine treatment for chemotherapy-treated, ER+ breast cancer patients diagnosed aged 45-50 years consists of mainly AI followed by a switch strategy and mainly tamoxifen.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPerimenopauseTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID34101806
PMCPMC8562974
OpenAlexW3168413124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.