ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease
Quantifying Recruitment Source and Participant Communication Preferences for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Research.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community engagement, recruitment, and retention of minoritized participants in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research: A systematic review of disparities.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- The Preventing Alzheimer's with Cognitive Training (PACT) randomized clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Trial
- Improving participants' recruitment in dementia-related studies on social media through colloquial language in Lima, Peru.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Article
- Referral Sources Across Racial and Ethnic Groups at Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on effective engagement of diverse participants in AD prevention research is lacking.
objectivesTo quantify recruitment source in relation to race, ethnicity, and retention.
designProspective cohort study.
settingUniversity lab.
participantsParticipants included older adults (N=1170) who identified as White (86%), Black (8%), and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (6%). MEASUREMENTS: The Cognitive Aging Lab Marketing Questionnaire assessed recruitment source, social media use, and research opportunity communication preferences.
resultsEffective recruitment methods and communication preferences vary by race and ethnicity. The most common referral sources were postcards for racial minorities, friend/family referrals for Hispanic/Latinos, and the newspaper for Whites. Whereas Whites preferred email communications, Hispanic/Latinos preferred texts.
conclusionsRecruiting diverse samples in AD prevention research is clinically relevant given high AD-risk of minorities and that health disparities are propagated by their under-representation in research. Our questionnaire and these results may be applied to facilitate effective research engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.