ArticlePloS one2021
COVID-19 detection using federated machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Combating COVID-19 Crisis using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Approach: Systematic Review.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024Pooled it
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Leveraging federated learning and edge computing for pandemic-resilient healthcare.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive experimental comparison between federated and centralized learning.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- A privacy-preserving dependable deep federated learning model for identifying new infections from genome sequences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A hybrid dense convolutional network and fuzzy inference system for pneumonia diagnosis with dynamic symptom tracking.PloS one · 2025Article
- FedNolowe: A normalized loss-based weighted aggregation strategy for robust federated learning in heterogeneous environments.PloS one · 2025Article
- Federated learning as a smart tool for research on infectious diseases.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Review
- AI-powered COVID-19 forecasting: a comprehensive comparison of advanced deep learning methods.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2024Article
- A Privacy-Preserving Approach to Effectively Utilize Distributed Data for Malaria Image Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning in public health: Comparative predictive models for COVID-19 case forecasting.PloS one · 2024Article
- FedEHR: A Federated Learning Approach towards the Prediction of Heart Diseases in IoT-Based Electronic Health Records.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Medical Imaging Applications of Federated Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- FCMCPS-COVID: AI propelled fog-cloud inspired scalable medical cyber-physical system, specific to coronavirus disease.Internet of things (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- PPChain: A Blockchain for Pandemic Prevention and Control Assisted by Federated Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- COVID-19 spread control policies based early dynamics forecasting using deep learning algorithm.Chaos, solitons, and fractals · 2023Article
- Improving the performance of machine learning algorithms for health outcomes predictions in multicentric cohorts.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Graph data science and machine learning for the detection of COVID-19 infection from symptoms.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Harnessing the power of AI: Advanced deep learning models optimization for accurate SARS-CoV-2 forecasting.PloS one · 2023Article
- Analysis of computational intelligence approaches for predicting disease severity in humans: Challenges and research guidelines.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic threatens human life, health, and productivity. AI plays an essential role in COVID-19 case classification as we can apply machine learning models on COVID-19 case data to predict infectious cases and recovery rates using chest x-ray. Accessing patient's private data violates patient privacy and traditional machine learning model requires accessing or transferring whole data to train the model. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in federated machine learning, as it provides an effective solution for data privacy, centralized computation, and high computation power. In this paper, we studied the efficacy of federated learning versus traditional learning by developing two machine learning models (a federated learning model and a traditional machine learning model)using Keras and TensorFlow federated, we used a descriptive dataset and chest x-ray (CXR) images from COVID-19 patients. During the model training stage, we tried to identify which factors affect model prediction accuracy and loss like activation function, model optimizer, learning rate, number of rounds, and data Size, we kept recording and plotting the model loss and prediction accuracy per each training round, to identify which factors affect the model performance, and we found that softmax activation function and SGD optimizer give better prediction accuracy and loss, changing the number of rounds and learning rate has slightly effect on model prediction accuracy and prediction loss but increasing the data size did not have any effect on model prediction accuracy and prediction loss. finally, we build a comparison between the proposed models' loss, accuracy, and performance speed, the results demonstrate that the federated machine learning model has a better prediction accuracy and loss but higher performance time than the traditional machine learning model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.