Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101755›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Jan J Lang, Mirjam Bastian, Peter Foehr, Michael Seebach, Jochen Weitz, Constantin von Deimling, Benedikt J Schwaiger, Carina M Micheler, Nikolas J Wilhelm, Christian U Grosse and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan J LangDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-897X
Mirjam BastianDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter FoehrDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael SeebachDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institute for Machine Tools and Industrial Management, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jochen WeitzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Josefinum, and Private Practice for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Pferseepark, Augsburg, Germany.
Constantin von DeimlingDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt J SchwaigerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-1510
Carina M MichelerDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nikolas J WilhelmDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3352-2895
Christian U GrosseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of Non-destructive Testing, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marco KestingDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer BurgkartDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DETechnical University of Munich · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, topology optimized, patient specific osteosynthesis plates (TOPOS-implants) are evaluated for the mandibular reconstruction using fibula segments. These shape optimized implants are compared to a standard treatment with miniplates (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 4) in biomechanical testing using human cadaveric specimen. Mandible and fibula of 21 body donors were used. Geometrical models were created based on automated segmentation of CT-scans of all specimens. All reconstructions, including cutting guides for osteotomy as well as TOPOS-implants, were planned using a custom-made software tool. The TOPOS-implants were produced by electron beam melting (thickness: 1.0 mm, titanium grade 5). The fibula-reconstructed mandibles were tested in static and dynamic testing in a multi-axial test system, which can adapt to the donor anatomy and apply side-specific loads. Static testing was used to confirm mechanical similarity between the reconstruction groups. Force-controlled dynamic testing was performed with a sinusoidal loading between 60 and 240 N (reconstructed side: 30% reduction to consider resected muscles) at 5 Hz for up to 5 · 105 cycles. There was a significant difference between the groups for dynamic testing: All TOPOS-implants stayed intact during all cycles, while miniplate failure occurred after 26.4% of the planned loading (1.32 · 105 ± 1.46 · 105 cycles). Bone fracture occurred in both groups (miniplates: n = 3, TOPOS-implants: n = 2). A correlation between bone failure and cortical bone thickness in mandible angle as well as the number of bicortical screws used was demonstrated. For both groups no screw failure was detected. In conclusion, the topology optimized, patient specific implants showed superior fatigue properties compared to miniplates in mandibular reconstruction. Additionally, the patient specific shape comes with intrinsic guiding properties to support the reconstruction process during surgery. This demonstrates that the combination of additive manufacturing and topology optimization can be beneficial for future maxillofacial surgery.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesBone ScrewsEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMandibular FracturesMandibular ReconstructionMaterials Testing

Identifiers

PMID34101755
PMCPMC8186800
OpenAlexW3170262556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.