ArticlePsychological science2021
Let's Talk About Each Other: Neural Responses to Dissenting Personality Evaluations Based on Real Dyadic Interactions.
Article in Psychological science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Increased and Coupled ERP and fMRI Responses toward Positive Social Evaluative Feedback: An EEG-fMRI Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of depressive symptoms on neuronal processing of social evaluative feedback and subsequent changes in expectations and self-view.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- How positive and negative feedback following real interactions changes subsequent sender ratings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differential effects of social feedback valence and self-relevance on brain responses and behaviour.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Encoding in a social feedback context enhances and biases behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of long-term recognition memory.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Meta-Accuracy of Very First Impressions: A Mini Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dyadic interactions are associated with the exchange of personality-related messages, which can be congruent or incongruent with one's self-view. In the current preregistered study (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.