Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101491›Full record

ArticlemBio2021

Experimental-Evolution-Driven Identification of

Erqin Li, Hao Zhang, Henan Jiang, Corné M J Pieterse, Alexandre Jousset, Peter A H M Bakker, Ronnie de Jonge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. InferiorMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TheApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. From microbiome composition to functional engineering, one step at a time.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Parallel genetic adaptation ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erqin Li *Plant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hao Zhang *Plant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Henan JiangPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Corné M J PietersePlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexandre JoussetEcology and Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter A H M BakkerPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronnie de JongePlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beneficial plant root-associated microorganisms carry out a range of functions that are essential for plant performance. Establishment of a bacterium on plant roots, however, requires overcoming several challenges, including competition with neighboring microorganisms and host immunity. Forward and reverse genetics have led to the identification of mechanisms that are used by beneficial microorganisms to overcome these challenges, such as the production of iron-chelating compounds, the formation of strong biofilms, or the concealment of characteristic microbial molecular patterns that trigger the host immune system. However, how such mechanisms arose from an evolutionary perspective is much less understood. To study bacterial adaptation in the rhizosphere, we employed experimental evolution to track the physiological and genetic dynamics of root-dwelling Pseudomonas protegens in the Arabidopsis thaliana rhizosphere under axenic conditions. This simplified binary one plant/one bacterium system allows for the amplification of key adaptive mechanisms for bacterial rhizosphere colonization. We identified 35 mutations, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions, and deletions, distributed over 28 genes. We found that mutations in genes encoding global regulators and in genes for siderophore production, cell surface decoration, attachment, and motility accumulated in parallel, underlining the finding that bacterial adaptation to the rhizosphere follows multiple strategies. Notably, we observed that motility increased in parallel across multiple independent evolutionary lines. All together, these results underscore the strength of experimental evolution in identifying key genes, pathways, and processes for bacterial rhizosphere colonization and a methodology for the development of elite beneficial microorganisms with enhanced root-colonizing capacities that can support sustainable agriculture in the future.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialRhizosphereArabidopsisDirected Molecular EvolutionGenome, BacterialMutationPlant RootsPseudomonasSoil Microbiologybeneficial microorganismsexperimental evolutionmicrobial genomicsPseudomonasrhizosphere-inhabiting microbes

Identifiers

PMID34101491
PMCPMC8262913
OpenAlexW3166450572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.