GuidelineArthritis care & research2021
2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Guideline in Arthritis care & research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 497 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
497 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,221 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection risks associated with b/tsDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- 2024 Update of the Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) Recommendations for Rheumatoid Arthritis Management.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Guideline
- Pooled it
- Gastrointestinal adverse events among methotrexate users in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Co-designing interventions for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of cancer risks associated with JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world cohort studies.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Pooled it
- Subcutaneous methotrexate compared with oral methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of non-conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in early active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis.BMC rheumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic treatment options in patients with rheumatoid arthritis related pain.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Can Methotrexate Monotherapy Achieve Clinical Remission in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Model-Based Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of the risk of heart failure with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A large-scale meta-analysis in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Pooled it
- Review: progression and heterogeneity of multiple sources of mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Methotrexate and Prednisolone compared to placebo and prednisolone in the treatment of severe Erythema Nodosum Leprosum: An international multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial-MaPs in ENL.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Vagus nerve-mediated neuroimmune modulation for rheumatoid arthritis: a pivotal randomized controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
437 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
37 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis.
methodsWe developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.
resultsThe guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional).
conclusionThis clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients' values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.