Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101349›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

Automated data abstraction for quality surveillance and outcome assessment in radiation oncology.

Rishabh Kapoor, William C Sleeman, Joseph J Nalluri, Paul Turner, Priyankar Bose, Andrii Cherevko, Sriram Srinivasan, Khajamoinuddin Syed, Preetam Ghosh, Michael Hagan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Incorporating Patient Similarity and Clinical Temporality in Disease Prognostic Modeling.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rishabh KapoorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
William C SleemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Joseph J NalluriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Paul TurnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Priyankar BoseDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Andrii CherevkoDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Sriram SrinivasanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Khajamoinuddin SyedDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Preetam GhoshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-5886
Michael HaganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jatinder R PaltaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rigorous radiotherapy quality surveillance and comprehensive outcome assessment require electronic capture and automatic abstraction of clinical, radiation treatment planning, and delivery data. We present the design and implementation framework of an integrated data abstraction, aggregation, and storage, curation, and analytics software: the Health Information Gateway and Exchange (HINGE), which collates data for cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The HINGE software abstracts structured DICOM-RT data from the treatment planning system (TPS), treatment data from the treatment management system (TMS), and clinical data from the electronic health records (EHRs). HINGE software has disease site-specific "Smart" templates that facilitate the entry of relevant clinical information by physicians and clinical staff in a discrete manner as part of the routine clinical documentation. Radiotherapy data abstracted from these disparate sources and the smart templates are processed for quality and outcome assessment. The predictive data analyses are done on using well-defined clinical and dosimetry quality measures defined by disease site experts in radiation oncology. HINGE application software connects seamlessly to the local IT/medical infrastructure via interfaces and cloud services and performs data extraction and aggregation functions without human intervention. It provides tools to assess variations in radiation oncology practices and outcomes and determines gaps in radiotherapy quality delivered by each provider.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation OncologyDocumentationHumansRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSoftwarebig data in radiation oncologyquality surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34101349
PMCPMC8292697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.