Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101078›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Evaluation of endocrine resistance using ESR1 genotyping of circulating tumor cells and plasma DNA.

Tilak K Sundaresan, Taronish D Dubash, Zongli Zheng, Aditya Bardia, Ben S Wittner, Nicola Aceto, Erin J Silva, Douglas B Fox, Matthew Liebers, Ravi Kapur and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Vaccines targetingHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  12. Androgen receptor and estrogen receptor variants in prostate and breast cancers.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Tilak K SundaresanCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Taronish D DubashCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Zongli ZhengCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Aditya BardiaCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Ben S WittnerCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Nicola AcetoCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Erin J SilvaCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Douglas B FoxCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Matthew LiebersCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Ravi KapurMicroMedicine, Inc., Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
John IafrateCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Mehmet TonerCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Shyamala MaheswaranCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. maheswaran@helix.mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-1709
Daniel A HaberCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bldg 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. dhaber@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Point-of care Microfluidics for Early Detection of CancerU01EB012493 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HABER, DANIEL A., TONER, MEHMET · 2010 to 2018
$19.6M
Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Consortium Career Development Program in Clinical OncologyK12CA087723 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI David Tsai Ting · 2002 to 2026
$17.9M
Bio-MicroElectroMechanical Systems Resource CenterP41EB002503 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TONER, MEHMET · 2004 to 2018
$17.4M
Modeling Metastasis and Acquired Drug Resistance Using Circulating Tumor CellsR01CA129933 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Daniel A. Haber · 2008 to 2026
$7.5M
NIA Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35AG049685 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Terri R. Fried · 2016 to 2026
$804k
Federal Share Research Career Development Award K12CA087723National Institute of Health 2RO1CA129933National Institute of Health 2U01EB012493National Institute of Health 5P41EB002503National Institute of Health 5U01EB012493NCI NIH HHS K12 CA087723NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129933NIA NIH HHS T35 AG049685NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002503NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB012493Susan G Komen Foundation CCR15224703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTherapeutic efficacy of hormonal therapies to target estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer is limited by the acquisition of ligand-independent ESR1 mutations, which confer treatment resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Monitoring for the emergence of such mutations may enable individualized therapy. We thus assessed CTC- and ctDNA-based detection of ESR1 mutations with the aim of evaluating non-invasive approaches for the determination of endocrine resistance. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a prospective cohort of 55 women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, we isolated circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and developed a high-sensitivity method for the detection of ESR1 mutations in these CTCs. In patients with sufficient plasma for the simultaneous extraction of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), we performed a parallel analysis of ESR1 mutations using multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and examined the agreement between these two platforms. Finally, we isolated single CTCs from a subset of these patients and reviewed RNA expression to explore alternate methods of evaluating endocrine responsiveness.

resultsHigh-sensitivity ESR1 sequencing from CTCs revealed mono- and oligoclonal mutations in 22% of patients. These were concordant with plasma DNA sequencing in 95% of cases. Emergence of ESR1 mutations was correlated both with time to metastatic relapse and duration of AI therapy following such recurrence. The Presence of an ESR1 mutation, compared to ESR1 wild type, was associated with markedly shorter Progression-Free Survival on AI-based therapies (p = 0.0006), but unaltered to other non-AI-based therapies (p = 0.73). Compared with ESR1 mutant cases, AI-resistant CTCs with wild-type ESR1 showed an elevated ER-coactivator RNA signature, consistent with their predicted response to second-line hormonal therapies.

conclusionBlood-based serial monitoring may guide the selection of precision therapeutics for women with AI-resistant ER-positive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNANeoplastic Cells, CirculatingEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGenotypeHumansMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesCirculating Tumor DNAEstrogen Receptor alphaAcquired ESR1 mutationsAI resistance ER + breast cancerCirculating tumor cells (CTCs)Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)High-sensitivity ESR1 sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34101078
PMCPMC8667563
OpenAlexW3170134743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.