Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101050›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Andexanet alfa and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage.

Mark L Vestal, Kimberly Hodulik, Jennifer Mando-Vandrick, Michael L James, Thomas L Ortel, Matthew Fuller, Maria Notini, Mark Friedland, Ian J Welsby

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving Patient Safety Through Proper Ordering and Administration of Andexanet Alfa.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark L VestalDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. mark.vestal@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-2815
Kimberly HodulikDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer Mando-VandrickDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael L JamesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Thomas L OrtelDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew FullerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Maria NotiniClincial Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Mark FriedlandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ian J WelsbyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited data exists regarding the clinical outcomes of andexanet alfa and four factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for reversal of ICH associated with oral factor Xa inhibitors. This was a retrospective, single-center, case series evaluating hemostatic efficacy of patients receiving andexanet alfa) or 4F-PCC for reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban after ICH. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, thrombotic complications, timing of reversal agents, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, patient disposition, and 30-day readmission rate. During the study period, 21 patients received andexanet alfa and 35 received 4F-PCC. Hemostatic efficacy occurred in 64.7% of patients receiving andexanet alfa and 54.8% of receiving 4F-PCC. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 45.2% for 4F-PCC and 30% for andexanet alfa. Thrombotic events were higher with 4F-PCC (31.4%) compared to andexanet alfa (14.3%). Median time from presentation to administration of reversal agent was 2.67 [1.75-4.13] hours with andexanet alfa and 1.73 [1.21-3.55] hours with 4F-PCC. Discharge to skilled nursing facilities and 30-day readmission were similar between groups. In this cohort, reversal with andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC differed in terms ofhemostatic efficacy and thrombotic events after ICH in patients anticoagulated with apixaban or rivaroxaban.

Indexed as

HemorrhageRivaroxabanBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor XaFactor Xa InhibitorsHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesPyrazolesPyridonesRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesapixabanBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor XaFactor Xa Inhibitorsprothrombin complex concentratesPRT064445PyrazolesPyridonesRecombinant ProteinsRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsBlood coagulationFactor Xa inhibitorsHemostasisIntracranial hemorrhages

Identifiers

PMID34101050
OpenAlexW3172309988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.