Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101037›Full record

ArticleProgress in orthodontics2021

Patients' perceptions of orthodontic treatment experiences during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

Sarah Abu Arqub, Rebecca Voldman, Ahmad Ahmida, Chia-Ling Kuo, Lucas Da Cunha Godoy, Yousef Nasrawi, Susan N Al-Khateeb, Flavio Uribe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Psychological Impact of COVID-19 in the Setting of Dentistry: A Review Article.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah Abu ArqubDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. sabuarqub@uchc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0090-4037
Rebecca VoldmanDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.
Ahmad AhmidaDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.
Chia-Ling KuoConnecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Lucas Da Cunha GodoyConnecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Yousef NasrawiSunna Orthodontic Center, Amman, Jordan.
Susan N Al-KhateebJordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Flavio UribeDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has impacted the care of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. We aimed to provide an overall view of patients' perspectives, concerns, and expectations towards their treatment throughout the clinic lockdown during the pandemic; and to assess patients' levels of mental distress and its association with their confidence in resuming care.

methodsAn anonymous, validated, in-person paper questionnaire was distributed to adult orthodontic patients' post-lockdown at an academic institution. The survey focused on the clinical aspects and patients' perspectives regarding orthodontic treatment during the pandemic. The Kessler Mental Distress Scale (K10) was used to evaluate their psychological status. Survey responses were descriptively summarized and confidence in resuming care was compared between normal patients and patients with mental distress using Mann-Whitney tests.

resultsOne hundred fifty-four patients were surveyed from July to October 2020. Mean age of the participants was 29.30 (SD = 12.01) years and 62% were females. Emergencies during the closure (21%, 32/154) involved primarily irritation with protruding wires. Patients were neutral regarding tele-dentistry and preferred their current fixed appliances over clear aligners. Upon resuming care, 80.51% were extremely pleased with the restrictive protocols and with high level of confidence in resuming treatment. The average level of anxiety was low, and a modest association was found between mental distress and reduced confidence in resuming treatment.

conclusionsFew numbers of minor emergencies occurred during the clinic closure. Despite the rising interest in tele-dentistry, patients were neutral on considering this option to monitor treatment and were content with fixed appliances. Patients had high confidence levels to resume their care based on the protocols established upon reopening. The association of mental distress and confidence in resuming care is suggestive and needs further investigation.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSARS-CoV-2COVID 19Orthodontic ClinicPatient psychologyStrict protocol

Identifiers

PMID34101037
PMCPMC8185310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.